Skip to main content

They're Ready, But Do They Know? (Posted January 25, 2016)

The National Association of Realtors – you may have heard of them – recently conducted a survey of renters who are 34 years of age or younger.  Nearly all of those questioned say they want to own a home in the future.  The NAR titled the survey Housing Opportunities and Market Experience – you read that right: HOME (points to their marketing department) – and it was designed to track topical real estate trends by asking consumers about two major topics: (1) whether or not it’s a good time to buy or sell a home, and (2) what are their expectations and experiences in the market.  “Despite entering the workforce during or immediately after the worst of the financial and housing crisis, the desire to become a homeowner appears to be a personal goal for a convincing majority of young renters,” says NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun.  The market conditions, according to Mr. Yun, are creating a “sizeable, pent-up demand for buying.” 

According to the same survey, over half of renters who earn $50,000 or more annually have not tried but feel confident that they could succeed in obtaining a mortgage.  Without a doubt, $50,000 is a sizable chunk of money, but here’s a bit of perspective: according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median salary for women age 25-24 is $35,620; the median salary for men in the same age group is $40,560.  Now, remember: “median” means the exact middle of a group.  In this case of the information shared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, this means that if you have 100,000 women between the age of 25 and 34, 50,000 of them make MORE than $35,000 – that’s A LOT of people who are confident that they could succeed in obtaining a mortgage.  Now, there’s a second but closely related factor that needs to be considered. 

Many people significantly lack a fundamental understanding about home-financing qualification criteria – this is especially true for renters who plan to buy a home within the next five years, according to a survey conducted by Fannie Mae’s Economic & Strategic Research Group.  For example, many respondents thought the minimum down payment was 12% when Fannie Mae’s actual figure is 3%.  As for minimum credit scores, many thought the requirement was above 650 for Fannie Mae – it’s actually a 620.  We can go even lower than that, too!

Fannie Mae’s vice president of Applied Economic and Housing Research (what is it with these really long titles?), Mark Palim, observes, “Advancing from aspiration to sustainable home ownership is more likely to occur if consumers have an accurate understanding of the requirements to qualify for a home loan.”  Thanks for that analysis, Captain Obvious!

All kidding aside, what are YOU doing to reach out to and let this new generation of buyers know homeownership is within their reach?  We have some proven and successful ways to help – give us a call!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si
Post a Comment
Read more

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor
Post a Comment
Read more

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a
Post a Comment
Read more