Skip to main content

I Don't Care About History (Posted April 18, 2016)

The title of this week’s edition is taken from a line from a song by The Ramones – it’s chosen for the irony, of course, because history is a great predictor of the future, and it can’t be ignored.  So, find your seats and settle down.  Thank you.  Today’s lesson touches on the history of the interest rate here in the United States, and there’ll be a test later.  No cheating off your neighbor. 

•  Early 1950s: interest rates were comfortably under 5%
•  1960s: interest rates were at 6% and starting to climb to 8% by the end of the decade
•  1970 to 1980: interest rates climbed to just over 12%
•  1981: interest rates peaked at just above 18%
•  2002: interest rates had worked their way back to 6%
•  2010: interest rates crept back under 5%

In economic circles (you should attend some of their parties – they’re real ragers), this is an almost picture-perfect demonstration of what they call the “60-year cycle”. With the economy being sluggish for the past five or so years, we’ve sort of bottomed out and held, but things are starting to look up, which means we’re starting a new 60-year cycle. 

With that in mind, let’s look at a quick comparison for a 30-year fixed FHA loan for $200,000 with 3.5% down – monthly payment (PITI):

4% interest rate:   $1,332.24
5% interest rate:  $1,448.90  ($116.66 more than the 4% rate)
6% interest rate:  $1,572.09  ($239.85 more than the 4% rate)

In the face of these numbers and this reality, a very wise man once said, “Buy your dream house now because you may not be able to afford it in ten years.”  If you haven’t already run out to have bumper stickers and t-shirts made with this slogan, I’d highly recommend you do so just as soon as you finish reading this newsletter.

It’s not going to happen tomorrow, but we’ll be back up to 5% interest rates sooner than we think.  The difference between a payment at 4% and 5% is significant enough for consideration – you’re looking at a yearly savings of just under $1,400 and an overall savings of almost $42,000 for the 30-year term. 

Using history and the 60-year cycle as our predictors, it is very likely that we’ll be back up to 6% interest rates on 30-year mortgages in just ten years.  That means that if someone were to buy a $200,000 house now, they will be able to afford much more house and keep their payments more reasonable.  Let me explain it another way: in ten years, a $200,000 mortgage, at 6%, is going to cost $5,276.70 more each year, or $158,301 more over the 30-year term of the mortgage.  Also, if home values increase an average of 5% each year, a $200,000 home that someone would be buying today would be worth over $250,000; conversely, what $200,000 will buy in ten years will be a house that’s worth just under $125,000 today.  If you don’t believe me, do the math yourself.  I’ll wait. 


I opened with The Ramones.  I’ll close with the Rolling Stones: “Time is on my side.”  No, it’s not!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si
Post a Comment
Read more

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor
Post a Comment
Read more

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a
Post a Comment
Read more