Skip to main content

I Don't Care About History (Posted April 18, 2016)

The title of this week’s edition is taken from a line from a song by The Ramones – it’s chosen for the irony, of course, because history is a great predictor of the future, and it can’t be ignored.  So, find your seats and settle down.  Thank you.  Today’s lesson touches on the history of the interest rate here in the United States, and there’ll be a test later.  No cheating off your neighbor. 

•  Early 1950s: interest rates were comfortably under 5%
•  1960s: interest rates were at 6% and starting to climb to 8% by the end of the decade
•  1970 to 1980: interest rates climbed to just over 12%
•  1981: interest rates peaked at just above 18%
•  2002: interest rates had worked their way back to 6%
•  2010: interest rates crept back under 5%

In economic circles (you should attend some of their parties – they’re real ragers), this is an almost picture-perfect demonstration of what they call the “60-year cycle”. With the economy being sluggish for the past five or so years, we’ve sort of bottomed out and held, but things are starting to look up, which means we’re starting a new 60-year cycle. 

With that in mind, let’s look at a quick comparison for a 30-year fixed FHA loan for $200,000 with 3.5% down – monthly payment (PITI):

4% interest rate:   $1,332.24
5% interest rate:  $1,448.90  ($116.66 more than the 4% rate)
6% interest rate:  $1,572.09  ($239.85 more than the 4% rate)

In the face of these numbers and this reality, a very wise man once said, “Buy your dream house now because you may not be able to afford it in ten years.”  If you haven’t already run out to have bumper stickers and t-shirts made with this slogan, I’d highly recommend you do so just as soon as you finish reading this newsletter.

It’s not going to happen tomorrow, but we’ll be back up to 5% interest rates sooner than we think.  The difference between a payment at 4% and 5% is significant enough for consideration – you’re looking at a yearly savings of just under $1,400 and an overall savings of almost $42,000 for the 30-year term. 

Using history and the 60-year cycle as our predictors, it is very likely that we’ll be back up to 6% interest rates on 30-year mortgages in just ten years.  That means that if someone were to buy a $200,000 house now, they will be able to afford much more house and keep their payments more reasonable.  Let me explain it another way: in ten years, a $200,000 mortgage, at 6%, is going to cost $5,276.70 more each year, or $158,301 more over the 30-year term of the mortgage.  Also, if home values increase an average of 5% each year, a $200,000 home that someone would be buying today would be worth over $250,000; conversely, what $200,000 will buy in ten years will be a house that’s worth just under $125,000 today.  If you don’t believe me, do the math yourself.  I’ll wait. 


I opened with The Ramones.  I’ll close with the Rolling Stones: “Time is on my side.”  No, it’s not!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Posted August 31, 2015

Fast . . . So They’re Not Furious InSellerate , a lead-generation company, conducted a study that yielded some very interesting insights: •    32% of consumers expect a company to respond to an online inquiry within 30 minutes •    42% of consumers expect contact within one hour •    M ore than half of the companies studied (56.34%) did not respond to the online or email inquiry at all Of those companies that did respond, the average response time exceeded 24 hours, and the primary response vehicle was email, which is a passive, relatively non-effective method of contact .   The take-away thought from all of this is “no kidding”, of course, but it underscores the wisdom that a lead is only as good as the work you put into it. Safety Over Sales According to a USA Today article, realtors in Iowa are taking steps to ensure the safety of all agents. The initiative includes an optional seller contract that prohibits any agent from ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Perspective Produces Progress

Each week I try to write something that will either make you think about a rather humdrum mortgage/real estate topic in a new way or at least clear the cerebral cobwebs.   Admittedly, some weeks I’m better at accomplishing that than others – my apologies for those “off” weeks.   As I’ve been trying to come up with a topic for this week’s missive, it’s not so much that I’ve been hitting a brick wall that’s been keeping me from inspiration, it’s that I’ve felt sort of “dragged down” by so many things that have been happening here in our own backyard over the past few weeks that have been . . . less than inspiring.   It seems that wherever you turn – TV, radio, Facebook, Instagram , newspapers (they still exist) – one party isn’t happy unless the opposing party is proven wrong and/or devastated.   I’m not advocating the philosophy that “everyone’s a winner and should get a trophy just for showing up” – I’m an advocate of just the opposite when it comes to c...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Spooky Truth

Do you have that friend or family member who pronounces a fairly common word incorrectly on a regular basis?   Or, do you know someone who’s pretty intelligent but consistently conjugates one particular verb incorrectly?   I have a friend of almost 20 years when something isn’t quite going his way, he gets “ fustrated ” – this friend is a very successful, college-educated professional who works with executives at the C level every day.   In the conjugation department, I have a relative who constantly says “I seen that” – I’m not sure if he knows that the word “saw” isn’t just something you use to cut through a log or plank.   The next time you find yourself in a discussion with a handful of people, watch for the use of the word “impact” and listen to the way it’s being used.   I’m willing to bet you’ll hear this phrase: “I was impacted by . . .”   Until relatively recently, the “translation” of that phrase would have meant that the person was, li...
Post a Comment
Read more