Skip to main content

Dethroning the King (Posted September 19, 2016)

There’s an old saying that you hear bandied about a great deal in the real estate/mortgage world, and it’s “Always wear clean underwear.”  Wait, that’s not it (but I wouldn’t pass up on heeding that advice either)!  The saying is “Cash is king.”  Sure, there’s something much sexier about having an aluminum attaché case with $100 bills banded and stacked all nice and neat than a piece of paper “saying” you have the money – there’s an emotional pull that you can work to your advantage when you’re sitting across from a seller, and you can hand her cash at that very moment and complete the transaction.  In other words, your powers of negotiation are significantly enhanced.  But when you take the emotion out of it, cash shouldn’t be king – it should be YOUR slave.  Let me explain. 

Let’s say you have the cash to purchase a $200,000 home outright (I’ll pause here for all you fans of the movie “Airplane” to join me and say, “You have the cash to purchase a $200,000 home outright”).  Let’s also say you have the annual income to make the monthly payment on a 15-year mortgage at today’s rates – Principal & Interest: $1,380 (“You have the annual income . . .” – sorry, I’ll stop).  So, before you make that purchase, you look at three options: (1) Pay cash outright and have no debt; (2) take out a 15-year mortgage with 20% down; or (3) take out a 30-year mortgage with 20% down.  Which of these three options will be the best FOR YOU for WEALTH BUILDING? 

Cash Option
If you paid cash for the house, your reserves would be completely depleted (theoretically); all you would have to invest would be the $1,380/month a 15-year mortgage would have required.  If you invested this religiously and averaged an annual return of 12%, at the end of 15 years, you would have $691,434; at the end of 30 years, you would have $4,477,046.  Not too shabby.  Not shabby at all, to be honest. 

15-Year Option
If you took out a 15-year mortgage with 20% down, you would have $160,000 at that very moment to invest.  If you invested that with an annual return of 12%, at the end of 15 years, you would have $875,711.  If you then took the $1,380 you were spending on a monthly mortgage and lumped that in religiously with what you’ve already made, at 12% at the end of 30 years, you would have $5,485,022.  I don’t know about you, but an extra $1 million for retirement sounds pretty good to me. 

30-Year Option
If you took out a 30-year mortgage with 20% down, you would have $160,000 at that very moment to invest.  The difference in monthly P&I payments between a 30-yr and 15-yr mortgage is approximately $510, or $6,120/year to invest.  If you invested the difference of $6,120/year along with the $160,000 with which you began, at 12% in 15 years, you would amass a nest egg of $1,131,301; and in 30 years, you would have $6,447,778 – ANOTHER million dollars!


I know what you’re thinking: won’t this strike a major blow to the aluminum attaché case market?  We’re just going to have to take that chance, folks.  Tell King Cash to get off his duff and get us some appetizers or something – and while he’s up, see if he can find “Airplane” on Netflix.  It’s a classic!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si
Post a Comment
Read more

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor
Post a Comment
Read more

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a
Post a Comment
Read more