Skip to main content

Dethroning the King (Posted September 19, 2016)

There’s an old saying that you hear bandied about a great deal in the real estate/mortgage world, and it’s “Always wear clean underwear.”  Wait, that’s not it (but I wouldn’t pass up on heeding that advice either)!  The saying is “Cash is king.”  Sure, there’s something much sexier about having an aluminum attaché case with $100 bills banded and stacked all nice and neat than a piece of paper “saying” you have the money – there’s an emotional pull that you can work to your advantage when you’re sitting across from a seller, and you can hand her cash at that very moment and complete the transaction.  In other words, your powers of negotiation are significantly enhanced.  But when you take the emotion out of it, cash shouldn’t be king – it should be YOUR slave.  Let me explain. 

Let’s say you have the cash to purchase a $200,000 home outright (I’ll pause here for all you fans of the movie “Airplane” to join me and say, “You have the cash to purchase a $200,000 home outright”).  Let’s also say you have the annual income to make the monthly payment on a 15-year mortgage at today’s rates – Principal & Interest: $1,380 (“You have the annual income . . .” – sorry, I’ll stop).  So, before you make that purchase, you look at three options: (1) Pay cash outright and have no debt; (2) take out a 15-year mortgage with 20% down; or (3) take out a 30-year mortgage with 20% down.  Which of these three options will be the best FOR YOU for WEALTH BUILDING? 

Cash Option
If you paid cash for the house, your reserves would be completely depleted (theoretically); all you would have to invest would be the $1,380/month a 15-year mortgage would have required.  If you invested this religiously and averaged an annual return of 12%, at the end of 15 years, you would have $691,434; at the end of 30 years, you would have $4,477,046.  Not too shabby.  Not shabby at all, to be honest. 

15-Year Option
If you took out a 15-year mortgage with 20% down, you would have $160,000 at that very moment to invest.  If you invested that with an annual return of 12%, at the end of 15 years, you would have $875,711.  If you then took the $1,380 you were spending on a monthly mortgage and lumped that in religiously with what you’ve already made, at 12% at the end of 30 years, you would have $5,485,022.  I don’t know about you, but an extra $1 million for retirement sounds pretty good to me. 

30-Year Option
If you took out a 30-year mortgage with 20% down, you would have $160,000 at that very moment to invest.  The difference in monthly P&I payments between a 30-yr and 15-yr mortgage is approximately $510, or $6,120/year to invest.  If you invested the difference of $6,120/year along with the $160,000 with which you began, at 12% in 15 years, you would amass a nest egg of $1,131,301; and in 30 years, you would have $6,447,778 – ANOTHER million dollars!


I know what you’re thinking: won’t this strike a major blow to the aluminum attaché case market?  We’re just going to have to take that chance, folks.  Tell King Cash to get off his duff and get us some appetizers or something – and while he’s up, see if he can find “Airplane” on Netflix.  It’s a classic!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...
Post a Comment
Read more