Skip to main content

44 Ounces of Wisdom (Posted September 5, 2016)

I walked into a local Circle K recently to grab a quick fountain drink – I don’t need anyone telling me how soda is bad for me and my kidneys, so just go with me on this – when I looked up and saw there was a small dispenser that you could use to add a flavor shot to your drink of choice.  You love Mountain Dew but want to add a little lemon to it, pop your styrofoam cup under the dispenser, press “lemon”, and out shoots a short burst of yellow-colored syrup that – I’m assuming – is lemon flavored.  Variety is the spice (or syrup) of life, right?

What caused me to pause, though, was on this particular dispenser there were four choices: lemon, vanilla, cherry, and cherry (zero calories).  Did I mention that the shot that comes out when you make one of these selections is enough syrup to fill, at best, the cap on top of a two-liter bottle of soda?  How many calories could there be in the regular, unadulterated cherry syrup that made it necessary to come out with a zero-calorie alternative?  Was there a rash of cases of young children and small Chihuahuas being rushed to the ER as a result of diabetic comas brought on by this calorie-laden cherry syrup that Circle K HQ made it their top priority to come out with this alternative?  So many questions ran through my mind! 

The truth of the matter is if you’re standing there filling up a foam chalice with 44 ounces of soda, is cutting down on the 10-15 calories (if that many) by going with “cherry lite” REALLY doing you any good?  Chew and swallow the Twinkie in your mouth before answering.  While you’re doing that, I’ll get to my point – I promise I have one.

This past week, I’ve conducted some informal research on millennials (read: I had a conversation with two people who are college graduates and are in their mid 20s) related to the real estate market.  To wit, I asked them what is keeping them from purchasing their first home.  You can guess at some of their answers and be dead nuts on, but the one answer I got from both of them that caused me to think about the subject of this newsletter is this: they don’t want to be tied down – they view purchasing a home as being chained to a particular city and giving up freedom.  Light bulb moment!

Up until this very moment, the vast majority of us had the mindset of “once the millennials take a moment and realize that home ownership is the American dream, we’ll be good to go – just give them a little time.”  After talking to these two people, I realized that mindset, when it comes to millennials, is similar to the thinking behind offering a zero-calorie cherry syrup – it’s dumb! 


What I’m about to suggest is not intended to be THE answer – millennials, like everyone else, are individuals and have their own opinions – but I think it’s a good one: we need to treat them like investors, not home owners.  We need to educate them on how to get the most house in the best neighborhood for the least amount of money.  We need to demonstrate to them that a purchase is a wealth-building tool just like many other business ventures they might be considering to improve their station in life.  This means helping them understand what others (renters in particular) are looking for in a house and pointing them in that direction – this will help them to see a purchase as a sense of financial freedom rather than being chained down.  This approach, in many instances, is going to take more time than just getting a pre-qual and then putting them in a car to go look at houses, but those of us who put the time in now will do much better as this segment of the market is only going to grow.  And when we start seeing the benefits of the time we’ve put in to help these investors, we’ll be able to take a break and have a soda – splurge, and get the real cherry.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...