Skip to main content

A Lesson in Royalty (Posted April 25, 2016)

Yes, this week’s edition has something to do with Prince – I won’t lie – but let me assure you it’s not a schmaltzy tribute to him or a recollection of something that happened to me in my childhood that is forever memorialized by a particular Prince song.  Actually, this week’s edition is about a Prince and a King – and by King, yes, I’m talking about Elvis Presley.  Go with me on this.  We’ll start with Elvis.

With a golden voice, Elvis Aron Presley sort of hit the genetic lottery: at the height of his success, he topped out at 6’0”, weighed a moderate 170 lbs., and had piercing blue eyes.  He came onto the music scene when television was starting out, and the movie industry was really hitting its stride – something he and his manager, “Colonel” Tom Parker, were very wise to exploit.  Selling the Elvis brand – not taking anything away from his talent or his manager’s finesse – wasn’t exactly rocket science.  It was sort of like selling ice water to someone who just crossed the Sahara desert.  Elvis released around 600 singles, had a boatload of #1 singles and albums, and snagged three Grammy awards – but he didn’t write a single one of his songs.  No, not a one. 

Born Prince Rogers Nelson, the artist commonly known as Prince, topped out at 5’2” and probably weighed 120 lbs. soaking wet – if you’ve seen some of his videos, you’ll know what I mean.  Coming on the scene when image was already a HUGE part of selling your personal brand, Prince’s personal packaging left a bit to be desired, but that didn’t stop him.  He garnered seven Grammy awards in his lifetime, an Academy Award, and had a very respectable number of #1 singles and albums to his name – and he wrote all of his own stuff.  In fact, he wrote and collaborated on a number of famous songs many people don’t associate with Prince: “Stand Back” by Stevie Nicks, “Manic Monday” by The Bangles, and “Nothing Compares 2 U” by Sinead O’Connor, just to name a few. 

While the success of these two men cannot be denied, their paths to these heights so few reach diverge quite significantly.  Elvis (and The Colonel) chose to find other people to give him almost finished products to which he would attach his voice and personality – and that was a formula that had great results.  There had to be many moments of stress and uncertainty, though, that Elvis experienced because he didn’t possess the ability to create his own music. 

Conversely, not relying on anyone else, Prince not only controlled his own fate by writing his own songs, he lent his talent and creative energy to other artists – he reaped rewards from both his own music and the music of others because of that.  I would imagine he experienced his moments of writer’s block, sure, but at the end of it all, he knew he had it in him to create something from nothing. 


What type of agent are you?  Are you a King or a Prince?  Are you relying on your good looks and golden voice, or are you creating opportunities for yourself, regardless of how you look doing it?  On a chessboard, perhaps there’s a reason the King can only move one space at a time while waiting for others to make their moves, and there’s no piece for the Prince – he’s off making a successful life for himself on his own terms rather than playing a game.  That sounds like the right way to do it. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Age-Old Concept Reaping Future Rewards

W hy are social media like Facebook and Instagram so darn popular among real estate and mortgage folks?   Hint: the top reason might be an endless supply of memes, cat videos, and the chance to be snarky, but the other reason runs a VERY CLOSE second.   Give up?   Answer:   They’re free – and they really help even the playing field by enabling a one-person shop look and market like an organization who employs an army of wordsmiths and graphic artists. This new century is glorious, right?   With that in mind, let me re-introduce you to a centuries-old concept that is equally glorious – and can help IMPROVE the playing field for you, regardless of the size of your team: karma.   On the subject of “free”, I’m not suggesting that you work for free, but when you freely give of yourself and your knowledge, you’ll see a greater payoff, I promise! Recently, an agent came to us with a question: she has a client who is looking to sell his condo.   It...

The Power of Doubt

We find ourselves in that weird week between Christmas and New Year’s – that week that feels a bit like the Twilight Zone where no one’s sure what’s real and what isn’t.   Because of that, most people tend to focus on one of two things: eating as much as possible or setting goals for the upcoming year.   The former is squarely focused on the present – how much can I stuff into my gaping maw at this very moment before I pass out and/or puke – while the latter is focused on the future.    Last week, before the Twilight Zone kicked into full gear, I read a short article that resonated with me, and I think it’ll prick up your metaphorical ears, too.   The author of the article is a gentleman who professionally trains Olympic athletes, and he highlights the talents of a particular athlete from the Philippines who is training to be a marathon runner.   He points out that this runner is not a professional athlete, nor does she receive any type of financ...

Get to the Point (Posted February 29, 2016)

As you may have already noticed, there’s some amateur art included in this week’s newsletter.   While it’s certainly better than a crayon drawing that might grace a refrigerator that’s supposed to be “mommy” but looks more like a B-movie creature, we all acknowledge there’s a reason the guy in our office who drew this . . . i s still working in our office rather than making a living elsewhere.   Be that as it may, there’s a point to the picture: is this how you’re allowing your client to choose their mortgage company?   In many cases, it’s probably not too far off.   Agreed, it’s wise to stay on the right side of the law and be sure you’re never accused of “steering”.   With that in mind, many agents tell their clients that it’s completely their decision as to what mortgage company they use (and it is, of course) and effectively step back from the entire conversation – using the illustration to the left, they’re putting the blindfold ...