Skip to main content

An Age-Old Concept Reaping Future Rewards

Why are social media like Facebook and Instagram so darn popular among real estate and mortgage folks?  Hint: the top reason might be an endless supply of memes, cat videos, and the chance to be snarky, but the other reason runs a VERY CLOSE second.  Give up?  Answer:  They’re free – and they really help even the playing field by enabling a one-person shop look and market like an organization who employs an army of wordsmiths and graphic artists. This new century is glorious, right?  With that in mind, let me re-introduce you to a centuries-old concept that is equally glorious – and can help IMPROVE the playing field for you, regardless of the size of your team: karma.  On the subject of “free”, I’m not suggesting that you work for free, but when you freely give of yourself and your knowledge, you’ll see a greater payoff, I promise!

Recently, an agent came to us with a question: she has a client who is looking to sell his condo.  It’s no longer warrantable, and the value is around $45,000.  He owns the condo free and clear, and really just wants to walk away from it netting $45,000.  The agent knew, of course, that no bank would lend on this, so she asked us for a possible solution.  We could tell by her body language that she had already approached a number of our competitors, and they had all, most likely in a very nice way, told her that it just wasn’t possible citing one or two of the obvious reasons.  Rather than joining the chorus of negativity, we offered her this solution:

The seller could put the condo up for sale for $60,000 and advertise it as a seller-carryback loan.  He would require the buyer to provide a down payment of 20%, or $12,000 – this leaves a balance of $48,000, which the seller now carries as a mortgage (he acts like a bank).  Are you with me so far?

The seller then takes this $48,000 balance and splits it into two notes: the first-position note is for $29,250 at an interest rate of 10% (I’ll explain how we arrived at those amounts in just a moment); the second-position note is for $18,750 at an interest rate of 10%.  The seller turns around and seeks out an investor who buys notes (or mortgages) and sells the first-position note of $29,250.

In the market today, investors who buy notes like these usually want to see a Loan-To-Value Ratio (LTV) of no more than 65%, and they want the interest rate to be healthy.  In this case, $29,250 is 65% of the value of the condo, $45,000; 10% interest is something that will give these investors a reasonable return.  Any higher LTV or lower interest rate, and it’s likely potential investors will start vanishing. 

This solution provides the seller with $12,000 from the down payment from the buyer of the condo plus $29,250 with the sale of the first-position note to an investor – he immediately nets $41,250, which is not quite the $45K he was looking to net.  Have no fear: we’re not asking him to settle.  Remember the second-position note?  Using just simple interest for the sake of the analysis, the seller would receive a check for a little over $150 each month from the title company on this second-position note.  In just two years, the seller will have received enough in residual income to get him up to that $45K net mark – and he’ll continue to receive residual income until that second-position note is satisfied. 


Wait, it gets better!  By selling the condo for $60,000 (using our solution), the agent helps improve the comps for the condo complex.  In the meantime, she can meet with other owners in the same complex who are looking to sell and help them, too – a growing list of referrals.  Perhaps the HOA will erect a statue in her honor!  Our solution does nothing for us – we make money by writing loans, and this isn’t a loan we can write – but it was the right thing to do.  While karma usually gets a bad rap, she’s got your back, too.  Hugs and kisses, karma!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...
Post a Comment
Read more