Skip to main content

An Age-Old Concept Reaping Future Rewards

Why are social media like Facebook and Instagram so darn popular among real estate and mortgage folks?  Hint: the top reason might be an endless supply of memes, cat videos, and the chance to be snarky, but the other reason runs a VERY CLOSE second.  Give up?  Answer:  They’re free – and they really help even the playing field by enabling a one-person shop look and market like an organization who employs an army of wordsmiths and graphic artists. This new century is glorious, right?  With that in mind, let me re-introduce you to a centuries-old concept that is equally glorious – and can help IMPROVE the playing field for you, regardless of the size of your team: karma.  On the subject of “free”, I’m not suggesting that you work for free, but when you freely give of yourself and your knowledge, you’ll see a greater payoff, I promise!

Recently, an agent came to us with a question: she has a client who is looking to sell his condo.  It’s no longer warrantable, and the value is around $45,000.  He owns the condo free and clear, and really just wants to walk away from it netting $45,000.  The agent knew, of course, that no bank would lend on this, so she asked us for a possible solution.  We could tell by her body language that she had already approached a number of our competitors, and they had all, most likely in a very nice way, told her that it just wasn’t possible citing one or two of the obvious reasons.  Rather than joining the chorus of negativity, we offered her this solution:

The seller could put the condo up for sale for $60,000 and advertise it as a seller-carryback loan.  He would require the buyer to provide a down payment of 20%, or $12,000 – this leaves a balance of $48,000, which the seller now carries as a mortgage (he acts like a bank).  Are you with me so far?

The seller then takes this $48,000 balance and splits it into two notes: the first-position note is for $29,250 at an interest rate of 10% (I’ll explain how we arrived at those amounts in just a moment); the second-position note is for $18,750 at an interest rate of 10%.  The seller turns around and seeks out an investor who buys notes (or mortgages) and sells the first-position note of $29,250.

In the market today, investors who buy notes like these usually want to see a Loan-To-Value Ratio (LTV) of no more than 65%, and they want the interest rate to be healthy.  In this case, $29,250 is 65% of the value of the condo, $45,000; 10% interest is something that will give these investors a reasonable return.  Any higher LTV or lower interest rate, and it’s likely potential investors will start vanishing. 

This solution provides the seller with $12,000 from the down payment from the buyer of the condo plus $29,250 with the sale of the first-position note to an investor – he immediately nets $41,250, which is not quite the $45K he was looking to net.  Have no fear: we’re not asking him to settle.  Remember the second-position note?  Using just simple interest for the sake of the analysis, the seller would receive a check for a little over $150 each month from the title company on this second-position note.  In just two years, the seller will have received enough in residual income to get him up to that $45K net mark – and he’ll continue to receive residual income until that second-position note is satisfied. 


Wait, it gets better!  By selling the condo for $60,000 (using our solution), the agent helps improve the comps for the condo complex.  In the meantime, she can meet with other owners in the same complex who are looking to sell and help them, too – a growing list of referrals.  Perhaps the HOA will erect a statue in her honor!  Our solution does nothing for us – we make money by writing loans, and this isn’t a loan we can write – but it was the right thing to do.  While karma usually gets a bad rap, she’s got your back, too.  Hugs and kisses, karma!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Posted August 31, 2015

Fast . . . So They’re Not Furious InSellerate , a lead-generation company, conducted a study that yielded some very interesting insights: •    32% of consumers expect a company to respond to an online inquiry within 30 minutes •    42% of consumers expect contact within one hour •    M ore than half of the companies studied (56.34%) did not respond to the online or email inquiry at all Of those companies that did respond, the average response time exceeded 24 hours, and the primary response vehicle was email, which is a passive, relatively non-effective method of contact .   The take-away thought from all of this is “no kidding”, of course, but it underscores the wisdom that a lead is only as good as the work you put into it. Safety Over Sales According to a USA Today article, realtors in Iowa are taking steps to ensure the safety of all agents. The initiative includes an optional seller contract that prohibits any agent from ...

Perspective Produces Progress

Each week I try to write something that will either make you think about a rather humdrum mortgage/real estate topic in a new way or at least clear the cerebral cobwebs.   Admittedly, some weeks I’m better at accomplishing that than others – my apologies for those “off” weeks.   As I’ve been trying to come up with a topic for this week’s missive, it’s not so much that I’ve been hitting a brick wall that’s been keeping me from inspiration, it’s that I’ve felt sort of “dragged down” by so many things that have been happening here in our own backyard over the past few weeks that have been . . . less than inspiring.   It seems that wherever you turn – TV, radio, Facebook, Instagram , newspapers (they still exist) – one party isn’t happy unless the opposing party is proven wrong and/or devastated.   I’m not advocating the philosophy that “everyone’s a winner and should get a trophy just for showing up” – I’m an advocate of just the opposite when it comes to c...

The Spooky Truth

Do you have that friend or family member who pronounces a fairly common word incorrectly on a regular basis?   Or, do you know someone who’s pretty intelligent but consistently conjugates one particular verb incorrectly?   I have a friend of almost 20 years when something isn’t quite going his way, he gets “ fustrated ” – this friend is a very successful, college-educated professional who works with executives at the C level every day.   In the conjugation department, I have a relative who constantly says “I seen that” – I’m not sure if he knows that the word “saw” isn’t just something you use to cut through a log or plank.   The next time you find yourself in a discussion with a handful of people, watch for the use of the word “impact” and listen to the way it’s being used.   I’m willing to bet you’ll hear this phrase: “I was impacted by . . .”   Until relatively recently, the “translation” of that phrase would have meant that the person was, li...