Skip to main content

Bicycles and Candy Bars: Qualifying for a Mortgage

We use and hear the term "don't put the cart before the horse" quite often whenever someone is doing something out of order.  In the real estate world, there's a similar saying that REALLY needs to catch on and be found on the lips of everyone and their dog (you know, for those who have talking dogs): "don't go looking at houses or call a realtor until you've been prequalified by a lender."  (Granted, it's not quite as catchy as the cart-and-horse bit, but give it time.)

Let me break it down into a very simple analogy: you, as a 12 year-old child, want to go to the store to buy a candy bar.  You know that your parents won't let you go to the store unless your friend goes with you.  You tell your friend that you'll give her part of your candy bar if she goes with you - she's in!  The two of you make the trek to the store on her bike; you're sitting behind her on the seat.  At the store, you walk in, pick up the candy bar, take it up to the counter, and the clerk rings it up.  When the clerk asks you for the amount required, you look up at him and announce that you don't have enough money.  While the clerk asks you to move along, your friend is mad (and still a little winded from having to pump the both of you to the store on her bike).  Now you have to go all the way back to your house to see if your parents will float you what you need - and if they don't, your friend will be REALLY upset.

You, of course, are the home buyer.  Your friend is the realtor.  The candy bar, obviously, is the house, and the store/clerk is the seller.  It would have made a lot more sense (for everyone involved) if you had gone to your parents BEFORE you involved anyone else and asked them for some money - you should have already had a general idea as to how much that candy bar was going to cost.  (Side note: you could make the argument that the friend is PARTIALLY at fault for not asking if you had the money before she put you on the back of her bike and started pedaling furiously toward the store, but it's ultimately on you.)  So, before the scenario above unfolded, if your parents had given you the money, everyone would have been happy: the store would have made the sale, your friend would have received her promised portion of the candy bar, and you would have your candy bar (and possibly the start of a nice sugar coma).  Had your parents decided not to give you the money, for whatever strange reason parents deny their children certain things, you would have had to decide either to go for a lower-priced item at the store or wait until you had saved up enough later to get that coveted candy bar.

Yes, this analogy is COMPLETELY DORKY - I'll freely admit that - but it clearly demonstrates how COMPLETELY DORKY it is to NOT go to the mortgage company BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE.  And once you have come to us to get qualified, we can pair you up with an agent we know will both fit your personality AND be best equipped to handle your transaction.  That last part is HUGE: since we helped get you qualified, we know what challenges might lie ahead based on your specific financial standing, so we'll be able to pair you up with an agent who has helped their clients overcome similar challenges and convert them into successful transactions.

I'm simply suggesting, for the sake of everyone's sanity, that this is the most logical way to approach the home-buying process.  Speaking of logic, I can think of a more modern version of the cart/horse saying: "Don't go drinking a kale smoothie unless you're absolutely sure there's NOTHING left to eat."  You get my drift, right? 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...
Post a Comment
Read more