Skip to main content

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?  Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”  I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex.

The development, set to go into practice on July 1st, is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.  It’s sort of a bittersweet development.  Let me explain:

Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of at least three data points: a person’s name, address, and either a social security number or date of birth.  Many liens and most judgments don’t include all three or four. This change will apply to new tax-lien and civil-judgment data that are added to credit reports as well as existing data on the reports. Among the reasons cited for this change included the need to improve standards for public-records data by using better identity-matching criteria and updating records more frequently.  As we all know, inaccurate information on your credit report can have severely negative consequences and take a lot of time and anguish to correct. 

Opponents to this move state that removing this data from a person’s credit report may make them LOOK better, but it doesn’t IMPROVE the risk a lender takes when lending to them.  According to LexisNexis Risk Solutions, whose parent company is a large provider of data to the Big Three, consumers with liens or judgments are twice as likely to default on loan payments.  The folks at LexisNexis go on to say that nearly all judgments will be removed and about half of tax liens will be removed from credit reports as a result of the changed approach.

According to the folks at The Wall Street Journal, these credit report changes will help just under 11 million people boost their FICO scores by 20 points and approximately 700,000 people boost their scores by 40 points combined, that’s about 6% of the US population who have FICO scores.  In the grand scheme of things scores range from 300 to 850 a 20- or 40-point bump isn’t THAT big of a deal.  However, for someone who has a 550 FICO and needs to come up with a 10% down payment for an FHA loan, if they got that 40-point boost, they would only need to come up with a 3.5% down payment for the same loan.  On a $200,000 house, that’s the difference between coming up with $20,000 versus $7,000.  So, for THAT person, THAT IS a big deal. 

As I said earlier, this development is sort of bittersweet.  Institutions that loan money like to make money, so they’ll find ways to hedge against the risk that these changes will present one of the more obvious ways, of course, will be an increase in lending rates, which everyone will get to “share”. However, they also like a market where their customers are calm and want to borrow money, which means they’re not going to make any changes at this very minute. 

If you already have good credit, but you’re on the fence about a purchase, this should be subtle enough of a shove to get you off of it.  If your credit score is less than stellar, don’t wait for the July 1st developments we can help you improve your credit now and get you out in front of all this before that time.  We don’t have a magic wand, but we still put on a pretty good performance every day of the week twice on Wednesdays.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Age-Old Concept Reaping Future Rewards

W hy are social media like Facebook and Instagram so darn popular among real estate and mortgage folks?   Hint: the top reason might be an endless supply of memes, cat videos, and the chance to be snarky, but the other reason runs a VERY CLOSE second.   Give up?   Answer:   They’re free – and they really help even the playing field by enabling a one-person shop look and market like an organization who employs an army of wordsmiths and graphic artists. This new century is glorious, right?   With that in mind, let me re-introduce you to a centuries-old concept that is equally glorious – and can help IMPROVE the playing field for you, regardless of the size of your team: karma.   On the subject of “free”, I’m not suggesting that you work for free, but when you freely give of yourself and your knowledge, you’ll see a greater payoff, I promise! Recently, an agent came to us with a question: she has a client who is looking to sell his condo.   It...

The Power of Doubt

We find ourselves in that weird week between Christmas and New Year’s – that week that feels a bit like the Twilight Zone where no one’s sure what’s real and what isn’t.   Because of that, most people tend to focus on one of two things: eating as much as possible or setting goals for the upcoming year.   The former is squarely focused on the present – how much can I stuff into my gaping maw at this very moment before I pass out and/or puke – while the latter is focused on the future.    Last week, before the Twilight Zone kicked into full gear, I read a short article that resonated with me, and I think it’ll prick up your metaphorical ears, too.   The author of the article is a gentleman who professionally trains Olympic athletes, and he highlights the talents of a particular athlete from the Philippines who is training to be a marathon runner.   He points out that this runner is not a professional athlete, nor does she receive any type of financ...

Get to the Point (Posted February 29, 2016)

As you may have already noticed, there’s some amateur art included in this week’s newsletter.   While it’s certainly better than a crayon drawing that might grace a refrigerator that’s supposed to be “mommy” but looks more like a B-movie creature, we all acknowledge there’s a reason the guy in our office who drew this . . . i s still working in our office rather than making a living elsewhere.   Be that as it may, there’s a point to the picture: is this how you’re allowing your client to choose their mortgage company?   In many cases, it’s probably not too far off.   Agreed, it’s wise to stay on the right side of the law and be sure you’re never accused of “steering”.   With that in mind, many agents tell their clients that it’s completely their decision as to what mortgage company they use (and it is, of course) and effectively step back from the entire conversation – using the illustration to the left, they’re putting the blindfold ...