Skip to main content

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?  Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”  I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex.

The development, set to go into practice on July 1st, is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.  It’s sort of a bittersweet development.  Let me explain:

Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of at least three data points: a person’s name, address, and either a social security number or date of birth.  Many liens and most judgments don’t include all three or four. This change will apply to new tax-lien and civil-judgment data that are added to credit reports as well as existing data on the reports. Among the reasons cited for this change included the need to improve standards for public-records data by using better identity-matching criteria and updating records more frequently.  As we all know, inaccurate information on your credit report can have severely negative consequences and take a lot of time and anguish to correct. 

Opponents to this move state that removing this data from a person’s credit report may make them LOOK better, but it doesn’t IMPROVE the risk a lender takes when lending to them.  According to LexisNexis Risk Solutions, whose parent company is a large provider of data to the Big Three, consumers with liens or judgments are twice as likely to default on loan payments.  The folks at LexisNexis go on to say that nearly all judgments will be removed and about half of tax liens will be removed from credit reports as a result of the changed approach.

According to the folks at The Wall Street Journal, these credit report changes will help just under 11 million people boost their FICO scores by 20 points and approximately 700,000 people boost their scores by 40 points combined, that’s about 6% of the US population who have FICO scores.  In the grand scheme of things scores range from 300 to 850 a 20- or 40-point bump isn’t THAT big of a deal.  However, for someone who has a 550 FICO and needs to come up with a 10% down payment for an FHA loan, if they got that 40-point boost, they would only need to come up with a 3.5% down payment for the same loan.  On a $200,000 house, that’s the difference between coming up with $20,000 versus $7,000.  So, for THAT person, THAT IS a big deal. 

As I said earlier, this development is sort of bittersweet.  Institutions that loan money like to make money, so they’ll find ways to hedge against the risk that these changes will present one of the more obvious ways, of course, will be an increase in lending rates, which everyone will get to “share”. However, they also like a market where their customers are calm and want to borrow money, which means they’re not going to make any changes at this very minute. 

If you already have good credit, but you’re on the fence about a purchase, this should be subtle enough of a shove to get you off of it.  If your credit score is less than stellar, don’t wait for the July 1st developments we can help you improve your credit now and get you out in front of all this before that time.  We don’t have a magic wand, but we still put on a pretty good performance every day of the week twice on Wednesdays.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Numbers Don't Lie, But Wherein Lies the Truth? (Posted November 21, 2016)

Said with enough conviction, you can make almost anything sound true.   Preface the fabrication with “according to a recent bi-partisan government study,” and you’re three quarters of the way to selling the lie to a lot of people.   Seriously, try this. The next time you’re at a dinner party or having coffee with friends, pepper this little tidbit into the conversation: “I read something really interesting the other day.   According to a recent bi-partisan government study – I think it took them three years to get it all done – middle-aged men who drive either a Toyota Camry or a Honda Odyssey have more testosterone than younger men who drive either a Ford F150 or a Dodge Charger.”   You’ll get some raised eyebrows and looks of mild disbelief, but don’t let that deter you.   Just lift up your hands, palms outward, and say, “I just think it’s interesting, and it makes sense when you think about it” – and then change the subject to something completely u...

Dumb as (or Smart as) a Box of Rocks (Posted June 27, 2016)

Obviously, you all want to know what Brexit means to the economy and the housing market specifically.   So do I!   But since my crystal ball is at the cleaner’s, let’s give the Brits and the European Union a little time to work out the terms of their separation and look at something else.   What’s a “fad ”?   With the help of Google, this is what I got as a definition: “an intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something, especially one that is short-lived and without basis in the object's qualities; a craze.” In April 1975, an advertising executive by the name of Gary Dahl invented the Pet Rock.   The idea came from his sitting in a bar with some friends who were complaining about the cost and time required to take care of various types of pets.   He marketed his “pets” by placing a rock in a box cut and shaped like one you would get at the pet store to carry home a puppy or a kitten.   Along with the box and the rock, a booklet was included...

The Naked Truth About Home Buying

It’s highly likely I’ve already written about this, but I’ll try to make it entertaining at least.   There’s a guy who works in ou r office who suffers from kidney stones – and from what he’s described, “suffers” might even be a little too tame a word for it.   As an aside, though, when you ask him how painful the experience is, he gets an odd smile and says, “It’s the most intense pain I’ve ever experienced, but it’s hard to describe.   I’ve heard a lot of people compare it to the pain a woman experiences while giving birth.   To that, I must say, those people are big, fat liars!   I’ve been in the presence of a woman giving birth, twice, and her pain has to be 100 times worse.   They’re passing the equivalent of a Buick.   I’m passing a pumpkin seed.”   He’s always been a colorful fellow. He’s had this wonderful condition for over a decade now, and the stones make their appearance about every 18 months or so.   Up until recently, ...