Skip to main content

Mortgage Insurance Changes Equal Money in Your Pocket


With a recent announcement from MGIC, a leader in the mortgage insurance industry, it could very well be possible in the coming months that you can get a conventional loan on a 3- or 4-unit property with only 5% down if the property is your primary residence.  Yes, you read that correctly!  

Right now, there's an option to get into a 3- or 4-unit property as your primary residence with a 3.5% down payment, but that's an FHA loan, and the mortgage insurance will never go away as long as you have that loan.  If you want to avoid an FHA loan, you're required to put down 25% - and when you put that much money down, mortgage insurance isn't required.  

MGIC has floated out the possibility that they're willing to insure a 3- or 4-unit property (with it being your primary residence) if you put as little as 5% down.  Now, just because they've signaled their willingness to do this doesn't mean that a bank will do it - but if someone like MGIC is willing to insure it, banks will most likely follow suit (for the simple reason that someone like MGIC is taking on the risk).  

This development can mean two significant things (if the banks follow suit): 

(1) You can get into a multi-family property (that can possibly cash flow to the point that it's paying your entire mortgage OR MORE) for only 5% rather than 25% - on a $300,000 property, that's the difference between $15,000 (5%) and $75,000 (25%).

(2) Because it's a conventional loan, once you hit a certain threshold in equity (that remains to be determined - will it be 80% or 75%), you can drop the mortgage insurance.  

To sum up: you can save, in the example above, $60,000 in down payment AND reduce your monthly payment once you've hit the equity threshold.  That's a multifaceted bonus on a multi-family property!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Posted August 31, 2015

Fast . . . So They’re Not Furious InSellerate , a lead-generation company, conducted a study that yielded some very interesting insights: •    32% of consumers expect a company to respond to an online inquiry within 30 minutes •    42% of consumers expect contact within one hour •    M ore than half of the companies studied (56.34%) did not respond to the online or email inquiry at all Of those companies that did respond, the average response time exceeded 24 hours, and the primary response vehicle was email, which is a passive, relatively non-effective method of contact .   The take-away thought from all of this is “no kidding”, of course, but it underscores the wisdom that a lead is only as good as the work you put into it. Safety Over Sales According to a USA Today article, realtors in Iowa are taking steps to ensure the safety of all agents. The initiative includes an optional seller contract that prohibits any agent from ...

Perspective Produces Progress

Each week I try to write something that will either make you think about a rather humdrum mortgage/real estate topic in a new way or at least clear the cerebral cobwebs.   Admittedly, some weeks I’m better at accomplishing that than others – my apologies for those “off” weeks.   As I’ve been trying to come up with a topic for this week’s missive, it’s not so much that I’ve been hitting a brick wall that’s been keeping me from inspiration, it’s that I’ve felt sort of “dragged down” by so many things that have been happening here in our own backyard over the past few weeks that have been . . . less than inspiring.   It seems that wherever you turn – TV, radio, Facebook, Instagram , newspapers (they still exist) – one party isn’t happy unless the opposing party is proven wrong and/or devastated.   I’m not advocating the philosophy that “everyone’s a winner and should get a trophy just for showing up” – I’m an advocate of just the opposite when it comes to c...

The Spooky Truth

Do you have that friend or family member who pronounces a fairly common word incorrectly on a regular basis?   Or, do you know someone who’s pretty intelligent but consistently conjugates one particular verb incorrectly?   I have a friend of almost 20 years when something isn’t quite going his way, he gets “ fustrated ” – this friend is a very successful, college-educated professional who works with executives at the C level every day.   In the conjugation department, I have a relative who constantly says “I seen that” – I’m not sure if he knows that the word “saw” isn’t just something you use to cut through a log or plank.   The next time you find yourself in a discussion with a handful of people, watch for the use of the word “impact” and listen to the way it’s being used.   I’m willing to bet you’ll hear this phrase: “I was impacted by . . .”   Until relatively recently, the “translation” of that phrase would have meant that the person was, li...