Mortgage Insurance Changes Equal Money in Your Pocket

With a recent announcement from MGIC, a leader in the mortgage insurance industry, it could very well be possible in the coming months that you can get a conventional loan on a 3- or 4-unit property with only 5% down if the property is your primary residence. Yes, you read that correctly!

Right now, there's an option to get into a 3- or 4-unit property as your primary residence with a 3.5% down payment, but that's an FHA loan, and the mortgage insurance will never go away as long as you have that loan. If you want to avoid an FHA loan, you're required to put down 25% - and when you put that much money down, mortgage insurance isn't required.

MGIC has floated out the possibility that they're willing to insure a 3- or 4-unit property (with it being your primary residence) if you put as little as 5% down. Now, just because they've signaled their willingness to do this doesn't mean that a bank will do it - but if someone like MGIC is willing to insure it, banks will most likely follow suit (for the simple reason that someone like MGIC is taking on the risk).

This development can mean two significant things (if the banks follow suit):

(1) You can get into a multi-family property (that can possibly cash flow to the point that it's paying your entire mortgage OR MORE) for only 5% rather than 25% - on a $300,000 property, that's the difference between $15,000 (5%) and $75,000 (25%).

(2) Because it's a conventional loan, once you hit a certain threshold in equity (that remains to be determined - will it be 80% or 75%), you can drop the mortgage insurance.

To sum up: you can save, in the example above, $60,000 in down payment AND reduce your monthly payment once you've hit the equity threshold. That's a multifaceted bonus on a multi-family property!

Comments

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time. Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?” I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response. I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything: you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face. While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.” And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense. In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”? Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!” I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away. It’s sort of a bittersweet development. Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...

Search This Blog