Skip to main content

Here Comes the Sun (Posted December 5, 2016)

In a podcast recently, the guest asked the host an interesting question that went something like this: “If you walked into a local coffee shop and you saw a 50-year-old woman with thick-framed glasses and greying hair pulled back into a bun, would you think she’s a librarian or a sales person?”  The host, while he knew he was being set up for something, said, “Naturally, my mind would immediately go to librarian.”  The guest went on to explain that this is the natural presumption based on appearances and our predisposition toward certain images we as a society have of particular occupations.  Then he added, “There are over 300,000 sales people here in the United States, while there are probably around 30,000 librarians.  Statistically, the likelihood that the woman you see in the coffee shop is a sales person rather than a librarian is ten times greater.” 

Interestingly, the guest used this example not to make a point about how we need to shed our prejudices and join hands to sing along to a Joan Baez record.  He actually used it to set up the following point: while there are times when our presumptions are dead wrong, quite often they’re right on the money because they’re based on a wealth of past experiences.  This caused me to think about something I had read that same day about appraisals. 

It was recently announced that housing giant Freddie Mac plans to dispense with traditional appraisals on some loan applications for home purchases, replacing them with an alternative valuation system that would be free of charge to both lenders and borrowers.  The folks at Freddie Mac confirmed that they could begin the no-appraisal concept as early as next spring. You read that correctly, ladies and gentlemen: NEXT SPRING! 

What does this have to do with the example with which I opened this week’s newsletter?  Instead of using professional appraisers, Freddie plans to tap into what it says is a vast trove of data it has assembled on millions of existing houses nationwide, supplement that with additional information related to valuation, and use the results in its assessments of applications.  In other words, they’re going to use their wealth of past experiences.

For consumers, the company believes, this could not only eliminate appraisal expenses which typically range from $350 to $600 or more (some areas are seeing these costs bumping up against the $1K mark) but could cut down on current closing delays that are related to the appraisal process.

The spring is still a number of blizzards and a long thaw off from today, and it remains to be seen how all this will take shape, but it’s a breath of fresh air to see things in this industry evolving with the times sort of like the card catalog at the library going computerized!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Age-Old Concept Reaping Future Rewards

W hy are social media like Facebook and Instagram so darn popular among real estate and mortgage folks?   Hint: the top reason might be an endless supply of memes, cat videos, and the chance to be snarky, but the other reason runs a VERY CLOSE second.   Give up?   Answer:   They’re free – and they really help even the playing field by enabling a one-person shop look and market like an organization who employs an army of wordsmiths and graphic artists. This new century is glorious, right?   With that in mind, let me re-introduce you to a centuries-old concept that is equally glorious – and can help IMPROVE the playing field for you, regardless of the size of your team: karma.   On the subject of “free”, I’m not suggesting that you work for free, but when you freely give of yourself and your knowledge, you’ll see a greater payoff, I promise! Recently, an agent came to us with a question: she has a client who is looking to sell his condo.   It...

KNOWING is Half the . . . Problem

If you’ve learned one thing from reading these columns, it’s this: I don’t read a ton of books by or about the French philosopher Descartes or spend large amounts of money traveling the world to view the Masters’ paintings in far-flung museums – my entertainment and sources of knowledge run to the more . . . mundane, if you will.   Well, I’m not about to disappoint.   In the movie Men in Black , the two main characters J & K (played by Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones, respectively) have recently met and K is trying to recruit J to join the clandestine government agency that monitors aliens on planet Earth.   Agent K has just shown J a lot of things that are hard to believe/explain and urges J to keep them secret.   At this point, J interrupts him, and this piece of dialogue ensues: J: Why the big secret?   People are smart.   They can handle it.   K: A person is smart.   People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you...

Control Your Money, Not Vice Versa

A few weeks ago, I wrote a post very similar to this - in fact, some aspects are identical - but I'm putting a slightly different twist on it to alter the perspective by a tad.   Whenever I meet a real estate investor who likes to take the fix-n-flip approach, I always ask why they go that route rather than subscribe to a buy-n-hold approach.  There are different answers to that question, but they all seem to have a common thread running through all of them: "I need the money to go out and buy another house to flip."  Sure, most people have a limited supply of cash on hand, so that makes sense.  With that said, there are three options EVERY real estate investor should know about - but, usually, they only know about the first one.  Let me set this up: Real-life example: the property in question costs $77,000 to acquire and $18,000 to rehab (total cash put out equals $95,000).  The property then can sell for $135,000.  Ready? Traditional...