Skip to main content

Here Comes the Sun (Posted December 5, 2016)

In a podcast recently, the guest asked the host an interesting question that went something like this: “If you walked into a local coffee shop and you saw a 50-year-old woman with thick-framed glasses and greying hair pulled back into a bun, would you think she’s a librarian or a sales person?”  The host, while he knew he was being set up for something, said, “Naturally, my mind would immediately go to librarian.”  The guest went on to explain that this is the natural presumption based on appearances and our predisposition toward certain images we as a society have of particular occupations.  Then he added, “There are over 300,000 sales people here in the United States, while there are probably around 30,000 librarians.  Statistically, the likelihood that the woman you see in the coffee shop is a sales person rather than a librarian is ten times greater.” 

Interestingly, the guest used this example not to make a point about how we need to shed our prejudices and join hands to sing along to a Joan Baez record.  He actually used it to set up the following point: while there are times when our presumptions are dead wrong, quite often they’re right on the money because they’re based on a wealth of past experiences.  This caused me to think about something I had read that same day about appraisals. 

It was recently announced that housing giant Freddie Mac plans to dispense with traditional appraisals on some loan applications for home purchases, replacing them with an alternative valuation system that would be free of charge to both lenders and borrowers.  The folks at Freddie Mac confirmed that they could begin the no-appraisal concept as early as next spring. You read that correctly, ladies and gentlemen: NEXT SPRING! 

What does this have to do with the example with which I opened this week’s newsletter?  Instead of using professional appraisers, Freddie plans to tap into what it says is a vast trove of data it has assembled on millions of existing houses nationwide, supplement that with additional information related to valuation, and use the results in its assessments of applications.  In other words, they’re going to use their wealth of past experiences.

For consumers, the company believes, this could not only eliminate appraisal expenses which typically range from $350 to $600 or more (some areas are seeing these costs bumping up against the $1K mark) but could cut down on current closing delays that are related to the appraisal process.

The spring is still a number of blizzards and a long thaw off from today, and it remains to be seen how all this will take shape, but it’s a breath of fresh air to see things in this industry evolving with the times sort of like the card catalog at the library going computerized!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a