Skip to main content

Here Comes the Sun (Posted December 5, 2016)

In a podcast recently, the guest asked the host an interesting question that went something like this: “If you walked into a local coffee shop and you saw a 50-year-old woman with thick-framed glasses and greying hair pulled back into a bun, would you think she’s a librarian or a sales person?”  The host, while he knew he was being set up for something, said, “Naturally, my mind would immediately go to librarian.”  The guest went on to explain that this is the natural presumption based on appearances and our predisposition toward certain images we as a society have of particular occupations.  Then he added, “There are over 300,000 sales people here in the United States, while there are probably around 30,000 librarians.  Statistically, the likelihood that the woman you see in the coffee shop is a sales person rather than a librarian is ten times greater.” 

Interestingly, the guest used this example not to make a point about how we need to shed our prejudices and join hands to sing along to a Joan Baez record.  He actually used it to set up the following point: while there are times when our presumptions are dead wrong, quite often they’re right on the money because they’re based on a wealth of past experiences.  This caused me to think about something I had read that same day about appraisals. 

It was recently announced that housing giant Freddie Mac plans to dispense with traditional appraisals on some loan applications for home purchases, replacing them with an alternative valuation system that would be free of charge to both lenders and borrowers.  The folks at Freddie Mac confirmed that they could begin the no-appraisal concept as early as next spring. You read that correctly, ladies and gentlemen: NEXT SPRING! 

What does this have to do with the example with which I opened this week’s newsletter?  Instead of using professional appraisers, Freddie plans to tap into what it says is a vast trove of data it has assembled on millions of existing houses nationwide, supplement that with additional information related to valuation, and use the results in its assessments of applications.  In other words, they’re going to use their wealth of past experiences.

For consumers, the company believes, this could not only eliminate appraisal expenses – which typically range from $350 to $600 or more (some areas are seeing these costs bumping up against the $1K mark) – but could cut down on current closing delays that are related to the appraisal process.

The spring is still a number of blizzards and a long thaw off from today, and it remains to be seen how all this will take shape, but it’s a breath of fresh air to see things in this industry evolving with the times – sort of like the card catalog at the library going computerized!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Posted August 31, 2015

Fast . . . So They’re Not Furious InSellerate , a lead-generation company, conducted a study that yielded some very interesting insights: •    32% of consumers expect a company to respond to an online inquiry within 30 minutes •    42% of consumers expect contact within one hour •    M ore than half of the companies studied (56.34%) did not respond to the online or email inquiry at all Of those companies that did respond, the average response time exceeded 24 hours, and the primary response vehicle was email, which is a passive, relatively non-effective method of contact .   The take-away thought from all of this is “no kidding”, of course, but it underscores the wisdom that a lead is only as good as the work you put into it. Safety Over Sales According to a USA Today article, realtors in Iowa are taking steps to ensure the safety of all agents. The initiative includes an optional seller contract that prohibits any agent from ...

Rates are Overrated

Buckle up and get ready to have your mind blown!   Okay, it’s not THAT mind blowing – some of you might even say, “well, duh” – but it’s still interesting. The economists (that’s a fancy term for “the smart folks”) at the New York Federal Reserve published the results of a study, which reveal that changes in down payment requirements have MORE influence over home buyers’ willingness to buy than changes in rates.   Follow me on this – you’ll be glad you did! Surveying both buyers and renters, those smarty pants at the Fed found that the effect of interest rates may be overrated when compared to changes in down payment requirements.   The study found: • Dropping the down payment from 20% to 5% INCREASES the willingness to purchase, on average, by 15% among buyers and 40% among renters • Decreasing the interest rate on a 30-year fixed-rate loan only raised the willingness to purchase by 5%, on average If you’re straddling the fence between BUY RIG...

Perspective Produces Progress

Each week I try to write something that will either make you think about a rather humdrum mortgage/real estate topic in a new way or at least clear the cerebral cobwebs.   Admittedly, some weeks I’m better at accomplishing that than others – my apologies for those “off” weeks.   As I’ve been trying to come up with a topic for this week’s missive, it’s not so much that I’ve been hitting a brick wall that’s been keeping me from inspiration, it’s that I’ve felt sort of “dragged down” by so many things that have been happening here in our own backyard over the past few weeks that have been . . . less than inspiring.   It seems that wherever you turn – TV, radio, Facebook, Instagram , newspapers (they still exist) – one party isn’t happy unless the opposing party is proven wrong and/or devastated.   I’m not advocating the philosophy that “everyone’s a winner and should get a trophy just for showing up” – I’m an advocate of just the opposite when it comes to c...