Skip to main content

English in Need of Translation (Posted January 4, 2016)

George Bernard Shaw is credited with having written the line, “England and America are two countries divided by a common language.”  In other words, while speaking the same language, quite often two people can’t understand a word the other is saying.  That, I fear, applies to us in the mortgage world more than we would like to admit.  We get all nerdy and start talking about debt-to-income ratios and disclosures, all the while the person with whom we’re speaking zones out and starts thinking, “Today’s Tuesday, right?  It’s two-for-one tacos down at Felipe’s for lunch!”  Tacos beat nerdy mortgage talk every day of the week and twice on Tuesdays. 

These past few months, there’s no way you could turn on the radio or television and NOT hear or see someone talking about the Fed and whether they were going to raise the funds rate.  Regardless of the news station, they bring on “the expert” to explain what this means to you and me . . . and that’s when he or she might as well be speaking Swahili with a Ukrainian accent.  Sure, the words are all in English, but they’re arranged in sentences that sound like this: “Cats explode microwaving pool cues on leather Sundays.”  You’re not sure if you should run for your life or buy stock in these furiously awesome felines.  Before you do anything hasty, take two more minutes and read on – I promise to make sense of all this for you.

What the Fed does with the funds rate DOES have an effect on all of us, sure, but it’s not as severe as you might think:

•  From May 2004 to July 2007, the Fed funds rate moved up from 1.0% to 5.25% - sounds pretty dire, right?
•  In that same period, the mortgage rate rose from – are you ready for this – 6% to 6.75%

As I write this, the Fed funds rate is .5%, and the projections by the Fed indicate that by September 2017, that rate will be at 2.6% – that’s about half of the Fed’s increase in the May 2004 to July 2007 period indicated above.  In the words of David M. Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices (he must have really big business cards to fit that title on them), “These data suggest that potential home buyers need not fear runaway mortgage interest rates.”


While we all want to give Davey a nice warm hug, there is a bit of urgency that I would like to inject into the conversation here – and I’ll keep it in plain English, I promise.  Over the past year, home prices have averaged an increase of about 5%, which means a $200,000 house is now selling for $210,000 – and the prices are projected to increase by another 5% this coming year.  So, according to Mr. Blitzer, a potential homebuyer doesn’t have to buy TODAY to make sure the rates are reasonable, but they should start looking NOW.  Every $10,000 increase in a 30-year mortgage, is about a $50/month increase in the payment – that’s $600/year, which is a lot of tacos (twice as many on Tuesday)!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Age-Old Concept Reaping Future Rewards

W hy are social media like Facebook and Instagram so darn popular among real estate and mortgage folks?   Hint: the top reason might be an endless supply of memes, cat videos, and the chance to be snarky, but the other reason runs a VERY CLOSE second.   Give up?   Answer:   They’re free – and they really help even the playing field by enabling a one-person shop look and market like an organization who employs an army of wordsmiths and graphic artists. This new century is glorious, right?   With that in mind, let me re-introduce you to a centuries-old concept that is equally glorious – and can help IMPROVE the playing field for you, regardless of the size of your team: karma.   On the subject of “free”, I’m not suggesting that you work for free, but when you freely give of yourself and your knowledge, you’ll see a greater payoff, I promise! Recently, an agent came to us with a question: she has a client who is looking to sell his condo.   It...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Power of Doubt

We find ourselves in that weird week between Christmas and New Year’s – that week that feels a bit like the Twilight Zone where no one’s sure what’s real and what isn’t.   Because of that, most people tend to focus on one of two things: eating as much as possible or setting goals for the upcoming year.   The former is squarely focused on the present – how much can I stuff into my gaping maw at this very moment before I pass out and/or puke – while the latter is focused on the future.    Last week, before the Twilight Zone kicked into full gear, I read a short article that resonated with me, and I think it’ll prick up your metaphorical ears, too.   The author of the article is a gentleman who professionally trains Olympic athletes, and he highlights the talents of a particular athlete from the Philippines who is training to be a marathon runner.   He points out that this runner is not a professional athlete, nor does she receive any type of financ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Get to the Point (Posted February 29, 2016)

As you may have already noticed, there’s some amateur art included in this week’s newsletter.   While it’s certainly better than a crayon drawing that might grace a refrigerator that’s supposed to be “mommy” but looks more like a B-movie creature, we all acknowledge there’s a reason the guy in our office who drew this . . . i s still working in our office rather than making a living elsewhere.   Be that as it may, there’s a point to the picture: is this how you’re allowing your client to choose their mortgage company?   In many cases, it’s probably not too far off.   Agreed, it’s wise to stay on the right side of the law and be sure you’re never accused of “steering”.   With that in mind, many agents tell their clients that it’s completely their decision as to what mortgage company they use (and it is, of course) and effectively step back from the entire conversation – using the illustration to the left, they’re putting the blindfold ...
Post a Comment
Read more