Skip to main content

English in Need of Translation (Posted January 4, 2016)

George Bernard Shaw is credited with having written the line, “England and America are two countries divided by a common language.”  In other words, while speaking the same language, quite often two people can’t understand a word the other is saying.  That, I fear, applies to us in the mortgage world more than we would like to admit.  We get all nerdy and start talking about debt-to-income ratios and disclosures, all the while the person with whom we’re speaking zones out and starts thinking, “Today’s Tuesday, right?  It’s two-for-one tacos down at Felipe’s for lunch!”  Tacos beat nerdy mortgage talk every day of the week and twice on Tuesdays. 

These past few months, there’s no way you could turn on the radio or television and NOT hear or see someone talking about the Fed and whether they were going to raise the funds rate.  Regardless of the news station, they bring on “the expert” to explain what this means to you and me . . . and that’s when he or she might as well be speaking Swahili with a Ukrainian accent.  Sure, the words are all in English, but they’re arranged in sentences that sound like this: “Cats explode microwaving pool cues on leather Sundays.”  You’re not sure if you should run for your life or buy stock in these furiously awesome felines.  Before you do anything hasty, take two more minutes and read on – I promise to make sense of all this for you.

What the Fed does with the funds rate DOES have an effect on all of us, sure, but it’s not as severe as you might think:

•  From May 2004 to July 2007, the Fed funds rate moved up from 1.0% to 5.25% - sounds pretty dire, right?
•  In that same period, the mortgage rate rose from – are you ready for this – 6% to 6.75%

As I write this, the Fed funds rate is .5%, and the projections by the Fed indicate that by September 2017, that rate will be at 2.6% – that’s about half of the Fed’s increase in the May 2004 to July 2007 period indicated above.  In the words of David M. Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices (he must have really big business cards to fit that title on them), “These data suggest that potential home buyers need not fear runaway mortgage interest rates.”


While we all want to give Davey a nice warm hug, there is a bit of urgency that I would like to inject into the conversation here – and I’ll keep it in plain English, I promise.  Over the past year, home prices have averaged an increase of about 5%, which means a $200,000 house is now selling for $210,000 – and the prices are projected to increase by another 5% this coming year.  So, according to Mr. Blitzer, a potential homebuyer doesn’t have to buy TODAY to make sure the rates are reasonable, but they should start looking NOW.  Every $10,000 increase in a 30-year mortgage, is about a $50/month increase in the payment – that’s $600/year, which is a lot of tacos (twice as many on Tuesday)!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si
Post a Comment
Read more

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor
Post a Comment
Read more

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a
Post a Comment
Read more