Skip to main content

Posted September 21, 2015

Better SAFE than Sorry
Earlier this month, the Community Home Lenders Association posted on their website a side-by-side comparison of consumer regulation required of non-bank mortgage lenders (like Priority Lending) versus banks.  The details are chilling.
Every individual Loan Originator at a non-bank lender must:

Be licensed
Complete SAFE Act Mortgage Competency Test
Complete 20 hours SAFE Act pre-licensing courses
Pass an independent criminal background check
Do 8 hours/year of SAFE Act continuing education

Banks are completely EXEMPT from ALL of the above. Further, all non-bank mortgage lenders are subject to CFPB exams covering:

Compliance with RESPA
Other statutory requirements

All banks with under $10 Billion in assets are exempt – that’s 99% of all banks.   These facts do not imply that all banks play fast and loose with borrowers and their dreams of buying a home.  However, they do lay out a solid and persuasive argument to encourage buyers to go with a non-bank mortgage lender, without a doubt!

Shiny Objects Can Be Pretty . . . Expensive

Back in May, Trulia determined that new homes cost roughly 20% more than similar existing homes.  Here are some other things to share with buyers:

Disadvantages to Buying a New Home
More expensive than buying used
Location probably isn’t ideal
Despite being new, workmanship might be questionable
Could be subject to costly HOAs, even if it’s a house
Neighborhood dynamic is unknown
Property values might be more volatile
Construction nearby (eyesore and noisy)
More cookie-cutter, less unique


Advantages to Buying an Existing Home
Possibly cheaper
Better, more central location
Can buy in an established school district
Can own in a more reputable and recognized neighborhood
Old house might have new upgrades
You can always renovate if need be
Older houses tend to have more character, custom design
Could actually be built better than a new home

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Age-Old Concept Reaping Future Rewards

W hy are social media like Facebook and Instagram so darn popular among real estate and mortgage folks?   Hint: the top reason might be an endless supply of memes, cat videos, and the chance to be snarky, but the other reason runs a VERY CLOSE second.   Give up?   Answer:   They’re free – and they really help even the playing field by enabling a one-person shop look and market like an organization who employs an army of wordsmiths and graphic artists. This new century is glorious, right?   With that in mind, let me re-introduce you to a centuries-old concept that is equally glorious – and can help IMPROVE the playing field for you, regardless of the size of your team: karma.   On the subject of “free”, I’m not suggesting that you work for free, but when you freely give of yourself and your knowledge, you’ll see a greater payoff, I promise! Recently, an agent came to us with a question: she has a client who is looking to sell his condo.   It...

KNOWING is Half the . . . Problem

If you’ve learned one thing from reading these columns, it’s this: I don’t read a ton of books by or about the French philosopher Descartes or spend large amounts of money traveling the world to view the Masters’ paintings in far-flung museums – my entertainment and sources of knowledge run to the more . . . mundane, if you will.   Well, I’m not about to disappoint.   In the movie Men in Black , the two main characters J & K (played by Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones, respectively) have recently met and K is trying to recruit J to join the clandestine government agency that monitors aliens on planet Earth.   Agent K has just shown J a lot of things that are hard to believe/explain and urges J to keep them secret.   At this point, J interrupts him, and this piece of dialogue ensues: J: Why the big secret?   People are smart.   They can handle it.   K: A person is smart.   People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you...

Control Your Money, Not Vice Versa

A few weeks ago, I wrote a post very similar to this - in fact, some aspects are identical - but I'm putting a slightly different twist on it to alter the perspective by a tad.   Whenever I meet a real estate investor who likes to take the fix-n-flip approach, I always ask why they go that route rather than subscribe to a buy-n-hold approach.  There are different answers to that question, but they all seem to have a common thread running through all of them: "I need the money to go out and buy another house to flip."  Sure, most people have a limited supply of cash on hand, so that makes sense.  With that said, there are three options EVERY real estate investor should know about - but, usually, they only know about the first one.  Let me set this up: Real-life example: the property in question costs $77,000 to acquire and $18,000 to rehab (total cash put out equals $95,000).  The property then can sell for $135,000.  Ready? Traditional...