Posted September 21, 2015

Better SAFE than Sorry

Earlier this month, the Community Home Lenders Association posted on their website a side-by-side comparison of consumer regulation required of non-bank mortgage lenders (like Priority Lending) versus banks. The details are chilling.

Every individual Loan Originator at a non-bank lender must:

•Be licensed

•Complete SAFE Act Mortgage Competency Test

•Complete 20 hours SAFE Act pre-licensing courses

•Pass an independent criminal background check

•Do 8 hours/year of SAFE Act continuing education

Banks are completely EXEMPT from ALL of the above. Further, all non-bank mortgage lenders are subject to CFPB exams covering:

•Compliance with RESPA

•Other statutory requirements

All banks with under $10 Billion in assets are exempt – that’s 99% of all banks. These facts do not imply that all banks play fast and loose with borrowers and their dreams of buying a home. However, they do lay out a solid and persuasive argument to encourage buyers to go with a non-bank mortgage lender, without a doubt!

Shiny Objects Can Be Pretty . . . Expensive

Back in May, Trulia determined that new homes cost roughly 20% more than similar existing homes. Here are some other things to share with buyers:

Disadvantages to Buying a New Home

•More expensive than buying used

•Location probably isn’t ideal

•Despite being new, workmanship might be questionable

•Could be subject to costly HOAs, even if it’s a house

•Neighborhood dynamic is unknown

•Property values might be more volatile

•Construction nearby (eyesore and noisy)

•More cookie-cutter, less unique

Advantages to Buying an Existing Home

•Possibly cheaper

•Better, more central location

•Can buy in an established school district

•Can own in a more reputable and recognized neighborhood

•Old house might have new upgrades

•You can always renovate if need be

•Older houses tend to have more character, custom design

•Could actually be built better than a new home

Comments

The Naked Truth About Home Buying

It’s highly likely I’ve already written about this, but I’ll try to make it entertaining at least. There’s a guy who works in ou r office who suffers from kidney stones – and from what he’s described, “suffers” might even be a little too tame a word for it. As an aside, though, when you ask him how painful the experience is, he gets an odd smile and says, “It’s the most intense pain I’ve ever experienced, but it’s hard to describe. I’ve heard a lot of people compare it to the pain a woman experiences while giving birth. To that, I must say, those people are big, fat liars! I’ve been in the presence of a woman giving birth, twice, and her pain has to be 100 times worse. They’re passing the equivalent of a Buick. I’m passing a pumpkin seed.” He’s always been a colorful fellow. He’s had this wonderful condition for over a decade now, and the stones make their appearance about every 18 months or so. Up until recently, ...

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense. In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...

An Indelible Lesson

This is a reprint from about nine months ago, but I thought the timing is right to revisit this subject. Recently, I saw this gentleman at the gym whose upper body was almost entirely covered in tattoos. I struck up a conversation with him and learned that it took well over 100 hours, and it cost $85/hour. As we continued to chat, I was doing the math in my head: $85 X 100 hours = $8,500 ! Being the mortgage geek that I am, my next thought was, “I’m staring at a walking, talking down payment on a house!” There’s a huge misconception floating out there that 20% is required as a down payment. There are those products that do require such an amount, but there are so many others that don’t. A very popular loan option only requires 3.5%. In the case of my new gym acquaintance, $8,500 represents a 3.5% down payment on a $242,000 mortgage – that’s not a palace, but that amount of money could buy a modest home in a nice neighborho...

Search This Blog