Better
SAFE than Sorry
Earlier
this month, the Community Home Lenders Association posted on their website a
side-by-side comparison of consumer regulation required of non-bank mortgage
lenders (like Priority Lending) versus banks.
The details are chilling.
Every
individual Loan Originator at a non-bank
lender must:
•Be
licensed
•Complete
SAFE Act Mortgage Competency Test
•Complete
20 hours SAFE Act pre-licensing courses
•Pass
an independent criminal background check
•Do
8 hours/year of SAFE Act continuing education
Banks
are completely EXEMPT from ALL of the above. Further,
all non-bank mortgage lenders are subject to CFPB exams covering:
•Compliance
with RESPA
•Other
statutory requirements
All
banks with under $10 Billion in assets are exempt – that’s 99% of all
banks. These
facts do not imply that all banks play fast and loose with borrowers and their
dreams of buying a home. However, they
do lay out a solid and persuasive argument to encourage buyers to go with a
non-bank mortgage lender, without a doubt!
Shiny
Objects Can Be Pretty . . . Expensive
Back
in May, Trulia
determined that new homes cost roughly 20% more than similar existing
homes. Here are some other things to
share with buyers:
Disadvantages
to Buying a New Home
•More
expensive
than buying used
•Location
probably
isn’t ideal
•Despite
being
new, workmanship might be questionable
•Could
be
subject to costly HOAs, even if it’s a house
•Neighborhood
dynamic
is unknown
•Property
values
might be more volatile
•Construction
nearby
(eyesore and noisy)
•More
cookie-cutter,
less unique
Advantages
to Buying an Existing Home
•Possibly
cheaper
•Better,
more central location
•Can
buy
in an established school district
•Can
own
in a more reputable and recognized neighborhood
•Old
house
might have new upgrades
•You
can
always renovate if need be
•Older
houses
tend to have more character, custom design
•Could
actually
be built better than a new home
Comments
Post a Comment