Skip to main content

A House Looks Good On You


There are times when I come home from the grocery store, set the bags on the counter, and start unloading the bags’ contents to place them in the pantry, refrigerator, and freezer, and the thought hits me: I just shopped like my parents are out of town for the weekend and they handed me some cash to tide me over until they return on Sunday evening!  Just as I’m on the verge of setting up an intervention for myself, I spy a package of frozen spinach under an opened bag of tater tots, collect my wits about me, and take a moment to calm down.  (There’s not a chance I’m going to come close to thawing out that package of spinach, but it’s the thought that counts.)

Tired of the multiple fad diets being pitched and talked about on the internet and other forms of media, a man took it upon himself to prove he could eat ONLY junk food for a month and lose weight – and thirty days later, he had lost eleven pounds!  Now, he didn’t lock himself inside a Dunkin Donuts and eat his way through their entire inventory – I understand I’m killing the dream for many of you by saying that, and I’m sorry.  He did, though, eat lots of M&Ms, cupcakes, Oreos, chips, crackers, etc.  In doing so, he made sure his daily intake didn’t exceed 2,000 calories by reading the packaging and following the serving sizes that spelled out the number of calories. 

The scales weren’t the only thing that was affected by this special diet: his bad cholesterol went down, his good cholesterol went up, and he lost two percent body fat.  While his doctor would not recommend such a diet, mainly because losing that much weight in such a short period of time is not optimal, no one can argue with the results and this simple fact: it’s about moderation, and if you burn more calories than you eat, you’re going to lose weight – even if your “dietician” is Little Debbie or Hostess. 

Regularly, we get people coming to us for a mortgage who have run the financial equivalent of the diet gauntlet with multiple other lenders and failed.  They’re dejected and wary.  Many of them have gained even more “weight” (more debt, a renewed lease because they couldn’t close and have to keep renting, etc.).  Some are on the verge of giving up entirely and almost dare us to prove we can help them fit into that little black dress of a house. 

Remember, the key to the junk-food gentleman’s success was simple: he read and FOLLOWED the serving-size instructions to assure he was consuming a specific number of calories.  Unlike so many other mortgage companies, we send out a Loan Status Update every Friday to all parties to a transaction to help them know what’s been done (consumed) and what needs to be done so they can FOLLOW those instructions.  When a mortgage company doesn’t keep everyone focused, the equivalent of midnight snacks (shopping for and buying – usually on credit – new furniture before the home sale closes) and bingeing (adding more and more addendums to the real estate contract) can and will sabotage the process.  Stick with us and when we’re finished, you’ll be leaner (in a good way) and happier – we’ll bet a box of Twinkies on it!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si
Post a Comment
Read more

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor
Post a Comment
Read more

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a
Post a Comment
Read more