Skip to main content

Perception is Reality


Recently, I came across an article about the top grossing movies of all time, and my mind immediately ran to the likes of Titanic and Star Wars.  However, the author of the article factored inflation into the equation to determine which movie truly had the greatest draw with the public his argument was that a movie coming out today will make far more money with ticket prices being higher than one that came out 50 years ago.  With those adjustments, Gone With the Wind came out on top.  It’s not a bad flick, but I was a little surprised.  However, you can’t argue with the numbers based on popular vote via purchases.

Here’s the odd thing, though: according to the American Film Institute (AFI) the self-appointed vanguard of all things cinematic the greatest film of all time is Citizen Kane, a movie about a man who was fueled to succeed at all costs by his resentment for his parents for naming his childhood snow sled “Rosebud” instead of something way cooler like “Widowmaker” or “Death on Rails”.  (I’ll admit, I’ve never seen more than 30 seconds of this movie.)  Ironically, Citizen Kane didn’t even rank in the top 10 highest-grossing films of all time.  How could a movie be so great if it wasn’t that popular?  Hmmm. 

We have a similar problem in the real estate and mortgage world let me frame it up for you: according to a recent survey by the National Association of Realtors, only 13% of adults 34 years of age and younger realize they can buy a house with a down payment of 5% OR LESS.  In response to this, the findings of a joint research study by Fannie Mae and California State University-Fullerton prompted this conclusion: “Correcting consumer misconceptions may be a more efficient approach to expanding homeownership opportunities by encouraging households who may already be qualified to own homes.”  Translation: we need to simplify our marketing. 

Whether we market a property to emotional buyers by displaying beautiful photos and extolling the virtues of the public schools, or we go after the dollars-and-cents buyers by demonstrating that their monthly payment can be less than what they’re paying in rent, we’re not acknowledging and addressing the even more fundamental concern of having enough for a down payment.  If buyers believe they don’t have enough money for a down payment, all the beautiful photos and statistical analyses aren’t going to do any good: they’ve already shut themselves off from even considering a purchase. 

It’s possible to get an FHA loan with only a 3.5% down payment. Perhaps the next email drip for a $200K house should simply read, “For only $7K down, this could be yours.  On a conventional loan, there’s an option for a 3% down payment. So, for a $300K house, maybe it makes more sense to advertise it with a headline like this: “Down payment of ONLY $9K!”  When an agent is being interviewed by a potential buyer, maybe a good opening question from the agent should be, “Did you know that since the 1980s, FHA has backed home loans with only a 5% down payment?”  Headlines and questions like these get to the heart of the matter and help buyers immediately see it’s possible to buy now rather than wait!


Failing to realize this need to change how we market is like AFI stubbornly insisting that Citizen Kane is the greatest movie of all time.  We may have the “greatest” social media posts or the “greatest” marketing brochures, but folks aren’t going to be converted from potential homebuyers to actual homebuyers if their perception is that they don’t have enough for a down payment.  As the old saying goes, perception is reality.  There’s another old saying from Gone With the Wind that applies something potential homebuyers are going to tell us if we don’t clue in and change: “Frankly, I don’t give a damn.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Age-Old Concept Reaping Future Rewards

W hy are social media like Facebook and Instagram so darn popular among real estate and mortgage folks?   Hint: the top reason might be an endless supply of memes, cat videos, and the chance to be snarky, but the other reason runs a VERY CLOSE second.   Give up?   Answer:   They’re free – and they really help even the playing field by enabling a one-person shop look and market like an organization who employs an army of wordsmiths and graphic artists. This new century is glorious, right?   With that in mind, let me re-introduce you to a centuries-old concept that is equally glorious – and can help IMPROVE the playing field for you, regardless of the size of your team: karma.   On the subject of “free”, I’m not suggesting that you work for free, but when you freely give of yourself and your knowledge, you’ll see a greater payoff, I promise! Recently, an agent came to us with a question: she has a client who is looking to sell his condo.   It...

KNOWING is Half the . . . Problem

If you’ve learned one thing from reading these columns, it’s this: I don’t read a ton of books by or about the French philosopher Descartes or spend large amounts of money traveling the world to view the Masters’ paintings in far-flung museums – my entertainment and sources of knowledge run to the more . . . mundane, if you will.   Well, I’m not about to disappoint.   In the movie Men in Black , the two main characters J & K (played by Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones, respectively) have recently met and K is trying to recruit J to join the clandestine government agency that monitors aliens on planet Earth.   Agent K has just shown J a lot of things that are hard to believe/explain and urges J to keep them secret.   At this point, J interrupts him, and this piece of dialogue ensues: J: Why the big secret?   People are smart.   They can handle it.   K: A person is smart.   People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you...

Control Your Money, Not Vice Versa

A few weeks ago, I wrote a post very similar to this - in fact, some aspects are identical - but I'm putting a slightly different twist on it to alter the perspective by a tad.   Whenever I meet a real estate investor who likes to take the fix-n-flip approach, I always ask why they go that route rather than subscribe to a buy-n-hold approach.  There are different answers to that question, but they all seem to have a common thread running through all of them: "I need the money to go out and buy another house to flip."  Sure, most people have a limited supply of cash on hand, so that makes sense.  With that said, there are three options EVERY real estate investor should know about - but, usually, they only know about the first one.  Let me set this up: Real-life example: the property in question costs $77,000 to acquire and $18,000 to rehab (total cash put out equals $95,000).  The property then can sell for $135,000.  Ready? Traditional...