Skip to main content

Credit's Costs, Part II

Right up front, I’m going to admit that this week’s edition is going to be HEAVILY borrowed nay, copied word for word from an article recently written by Ken Harney, a gentleman who covers housing issues on Capitol Hill for The Washington Post Writers Group.  He does a great job of citing rules and sources it would be sort of dumb for me to try and rewrite it and try to pass it off for my own product.  Read on:

You’ve almost certainly seen or heard pitches for “credit-repair” services promising to clean up your credit problems, reduce your debt or even raise your credit score by 100 points.

But experts warn that these services can do far more harm than good to mortgage seekers — even get them rejected on the spot.

In fact, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has won two new legal settlements worth more than $2 million in penalties against credit-repair companies.

The CFPB alleged that Prime Credit, IMC Capital, Commercial Credit Consultants and Park View Law charged clients illegal advance fees and misled customers about what could be done for them. The defendants neither admitted nor denied the allegations, but they agreed to the settlements.

Under federal law, credit-repair companies may seek payment only when they can document improvements made for a client. Up until then, consumers shouldn’t have to pay a cent. But the companies in the settlements required an initial “consultation” charge typically of $59.95, hundreds of dollars for a “set-up fee” and monthly fees of $89.99.

For typical clients — and there were thousands of them — the companies sent letters to the national credit bureaus challenging “much of the negative information” in credit reports, “even if that information was accurate,” according to the CFPB. The companies then didn’t follow up or determine whether they had raised clients’ scores.

“We run into the damage they do every week,” said Joe Petrowsky, president of Right Trac Financial Group in Connecticut. But “you can’t get a mortgage with outstanding disputes” on your credit files.

Thomas Conwell III, CEO of Michigan-based Credit Technologies, which provides credit reports to lenders, says, “There is nothing any credit-repair company can do that consumers can’t do for themselves faster and at no cost.”

I realize I wrote about this not too long ago, but I believe these recent developments concerning the CFPB’s actions warrant bringing this back for a second look.  Keying off of Mr. Conwell’s comments above, potential home buyers can do this for themselves and we can help direct their efforts.  They should save that money and buy themselves a nice house-warming gift!  With anything left over, we wouldn’t say no to a box of doughnuts or a pizza.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a