Skip to main content

Credit's Costs, Part II

Right up front, I’m going to admit that this week’s edition is going to be HEAVILY borrowed – nay, copied word for word – from an article recently written by Ken Harney, a gentleman who covers housing issues on Capitol Hill for The Washington Post Writers Group.  He does a great job of citing rules and sources – it would be sort of dumb for me to try and rewrite it and try to pass it off for my own product.  Read on:

You’ve almost certainly seen or heard pitches for “credit-repair” services promising to clean up your credit problems, reduce your debt or even raise your credit score by 100 points.

But experts warn that these services can do far more harm than good to mortgage seekers — even get them rejected on the spot.

In fact, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has won two new legal settlements worth more than $2 million in penalties against credit-repair companies.

The CFPB alleged that Prime Credit, IMC Capital, Commercial Credit Consultants and Park View Law charged clients illegal advance fees and misled customers about what could be done for them. The defendants neither admitted nor denied the allegations, but they agreed to the settlements.

Under federal law, credit-repair companies may seek payment only when they can document improvements made for a client. Up until then, consumers shouldn’t have to pay a cent. But the companies in the settlements required an initial “consultation” charge typically of $59.95, hundreds of dollars for a “set-up fee” and monthly fees of $89.99.

For typical clients — and there were thousands of them — the companies sent letters to the national credit bureaus challenging “much of the negative information” in credit reports, “even if that information was accurate,” according to the CFPB. The companies then didn’t follow up or determine whether they had raised clients’ scores.

“We run into the damage they do every week,” said Joe Petrowsky, president of Right Trac Financial Group in Connecticut. But “you can’t get a mortgage with outstanding disputes” on your credit files.

Thomas Conwell III, CEO of Michigan-based Credit Technologies, which provides credit reports to lenders, says, “There is nothing any credit-repair company can do that consumers can’t do for themselves faster and at no cost.”

I realize I wrote about this not too long ago, but I believe these recent developments concerning the CFPB’s actions warrant bringing this back for a second look.  Keying off of Mr. Conwell’s comments above, potential home buyers can do this for themselves – and we can help direct their efforts.  They should save that money and buy themselves a nice house-warming gift!  With anything left over, we wouldn’t say no to a box of doughnuts or a pizza.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Posted August 31, 2015

Fast . . . So They’re Not Furious InSellerate , a lead-generation company, conducted a study that yielded some very interesting insights: •    32% of consumers expect a company to respond to an online inquiry within 30 minutes •    42% of consumers expect contact within one hour •    M ore than half of the companies studied (56.34%) did not respond to the online or email inquiry at all Of those companies that did respond, the average response time exceeded 24 hours, and the primary response vehicle was email, which is a passive, relatively non-effective method of contact .   The take-away thought from all of this is “no kidding”, of course, but it underscores the wisdom that a lead is only as good as the work you put into it. Safety Over Sales According to a USA Today article, realtors in Iowa are taking steps to ensure the safety of all agents. The initiative includes an optional seller contract that prohibits any agent from ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Perspective Produces Progress

Each week I try to write something that will either make you think about a rather humdrum mortgage/real estate topic in a new way or at least clear the cerebral cobwebs.   Admittedly, some weeks I’m better at accomplishing that than others – my apologies for those “off” weeks.   As I’ve been trying to come up with a topic for this week’s missive, it’s not so much that I’ve been hitting a brick wall that’s been keeping me from inspiration, it’s that I’ve felt sort of “dragged down” by so many things that have been happening here in our own backyard over the past few weeks that have been . . . less than inspiring.   It seems that wherever you turn – TV, radio, Facebook, Instagram , newspapers (they still exist) – one party isn’t happy unless the opposing party is proven wrong and/or devastated.   I’m not advocating the philosophy that “everyone’s a winner and should get a trophy just for showing up” – I’m an advocate of just the opposite when it comes to c...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Spooky Truth

Do you have that friend or family member who pronounces a fairly common word incorrectly on a regular basis?   Or, do you know someone who’s pretty intelligent but consistently conjugates one particular verb incorrectly?   I have a friend of almost 20 years when something isn’t quite going his way, he gets “ fustrated ” – this friend is a very successful, college-educated professional who works with executives at the C level every day.   In the conjugation department, I have a relative who constantly says “I seen that” – I’m not sure if he knows that the word “saw” isn’t just something you use to cut through a log or plank.   The next time you find yourself in a discussion with a handful of people, watch for the use of the word “impact” and listen to the way it’s being used.   I’m willing to bet you’ll hear this phrase: “I was impacted by . . .”   Until relatively recently, the “translation” of that phrase would have meant that the person was, li...
Post a Comment
Read more