Skip to main content

The Power of No

Amongst the ads and emails we receive each day ranging from “how to lose 75 lbs. in 12 days by eating just Three Musketeers candy bars and milkshakes” and “the lessons learned from a dyslexic 1980s pop musician turned auto mechanic”, there’s an occasional gem that stands out and helps you look at life from a different perspective.  In that vein, I was recently directed to an article on Forbes.com titled “15 Surprising Things Productive People Do Differently” that I found interesting. 

Surprisingly, it didn’t have little tidbits like “only sleep standing up” or “drink the sweat of Hollywood actors who have won an Academy Award three times a day”.  The one that stood out most to me was something that is attributed to Warren Buffet: “The difference between successful people and very successful people is that very successful people say ‘no’ to almost everything.”  This doesn’t mean that such people walk around all day with a negative attitude just looking for a chance to be a contrarian it means they must be presented with an overwhelmingly persuasive argument to buy into something or to change their minds.  This morsel of billionaire insight reminded me of mortgage underwriters. 

Contrary to popular belief, underwriters aren’t overgrown tree sloths who take an eternity to review your application underwriters have, on average, five fingers on each hand.  With that said, though, they are employed by banks and investors to look for reasons to say “no” to your request.  It’s nothing personal it’s actually a good business model.  On the marketing side of things, a bank or investor will tell you how they want to help you achieve the American Dream by getting you into a house it’s good public relations.  On the operations side of things, though, they want to make sure they uncover ANY reason that it would be too much of a risk to give you a huge chunk of money to buy that rambling ranch or mid-century modern house.  It’s their money you can’t blame them for wanting to make sure they’re going to get paid back.  If, at last, they can’t find a reason to tell you “no”, you’re good to go.  That IS a good business model.


Understanding the role of underwriters in this process helps you understand how important it is to pick the right mortgage broker the individual who’s going to help you make an overwhelmingly persuasive argument to which the underwriters can’t say “no”.  Any warm-blooded loan originator who has a license can take your application and submit it to the underwriter . . . and cross his/her fingers that it’ll pass muster.  And if it doesn’t, you’re forced to start the process all over again (and perhaps cross your fingers that you picked the RIGHT mortgage broker this time).  Instead, go to a mortgage broker who has a reputation for providing unique solutions to strange circumstances they’ve been trained to know what to feed the sloths without getting bitten.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a