Skip to main content

The Power of No

Amongst the ads and emails we receive each day ranging from “how to lose 75 lbs. in 12 days by eating just Three Musketeers candy bars and milkshakes” and “the lessons learned from a dyslexic 1980s pop musician turned auto mechanic”, there’s an occasional gem that stands out and helps you look at life from a different perspective.  In that vein, I was recently directed to an article on Forbes.com titled “15 Surprising Things Productive People Do Differently” that I found interesting. 

Surprisingly, it didn’t have little tidbits like “only sleep standing up” or “drink the sweat of Hollywood actors who have won an Academy Award three times a day”.  The one that stood out most to me was something that is attributed to Warren Buffet: “The difference between successful people and very successful people is that very successful people say ‘no’ to almost everything.”  This doesn’t mean that such people walk around all day with a negative attitude just looking for a chance to be a contrarian – it means they must be presented with an overwhelmingly persuasive argument to buy into something or to change their minds.  This morsel of billionaire insight reminded me of mortgage underwriters. 

Contrary to popular belief, underwriters aren’t overgrown tree sloths who take an eternity to review your application – underwriters have, on average, five fingers on each hand.  With that said, though, they are employed by banks and investors to look for reasons to say “no” to your request.  It’s nothing personal – it’s actually a good business model.  On the marketing side of things, a bank or investor will tell you how they want to help you achieve the American Dream by getting you into a house – it’s good public relations.  On the operations side of things, though, they want to make sure they uncover ANY reason that it would be too much of a risk to give you a huge chunk of money to buy that rambling ranch or mid-century modern house.  It’s their money – you can’t blame them for wanting to make sure they’re going to get paid back.  If, at last, they can’t find a reason to tell you “no”, you’re good to go.  That IS a good business model.


Understanding the role of underwriters in this process helps you understand how important it is to pick the right mortgage broker – the individual who’s going to help you make an overwhelmingly persuasive argument to which the underwriters can’t say “no”.  Any warm-blooded loan originator who has a license can take your application and submit it to the underwriter . . . and cross his/her fingers that it’ll pass muster.  And if it doesn’t, you’re forced to start the process all over again (and perhaps cross your fingers that you picked the RIGHT mortgage broker this time).  Instead, go to a mortgage broker who has a reputation for providing unique solutions to strange circumstances – they’ve been trained to know what to feed the sloths without getting bitten.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...
Post a Comment
Read more