Skip to main content

Equity Rocks!

In the ‘80s and ’90s (I realize that was about a million years ago to many of you), there was a musician who had his share of the limelight and went by the name of Adam Ant (I’m about 175% sure he wasn’t born with that name).  At any rate, Mr. Ant wrote his own music and lyrics, and he was well known for having lyrics that made no sense – in fact, in many instances, he went out of his way to MAKE SURE they didn’t make any sense.  His 1985 hit “Vive Le Rock” is one such example with these opening lyrics: “Bang bang, you’re dead / Did not, did too / Stop diddy-bopping buddy / Bouncing Betty on you.”  Many people think the mortgage industry pulled an Adam Ant when it introduced Reverse Mortgages back in 1989 - the words were all in English, but the way they were arranged on the page just didn’t make any sense. 

The easiest way to appreciate a Reverse Mortgage is to STOP thinking about a mortgage as a means to an end: owning your home outright with no further monthly payments.  Instead, you need to think of your home as a vehicle that keeps you moving along UNTIL THE END (quite literally).  And remember, a Reverse Mortgage not only applies to refinancing – it enables people to BUY a home.

Rather than boring you with the ins and outs of a Reverse Mortgage, let me give you a practical exercise to run though in your head.  For most people in their golden years, medical care is their biggest expense.  You’re retired, your house is paid off, and your source of income is your investment account.  If managed properly, the funds in that account will take care of your needs and wants until you pass away.  However, if you have medical needs with accompanying expenses that weren’t factored in when you set up your investment strategy, that account is going to be depleted a lot faster – and while your house is paid off, and you have no monthly mortgage payment, your house isn’t really “doing” anything for you.  Conversely, with a Reverse Mortgage, you can get paid TO LIVE in your home, and the money you make from your Reverse Mortgage can be added regularly to your investment strategy and/or cover those unexpected medical expenses – either way, your investment account stays a lot healthier, right?  Also, with a Reverse Mortgage in place, you stay in your home as long as you wish. 

At this point, you’re probably asking, “That’s fine and dandy for people who are over 62 years of age, but what about someone young who’s looking to buy her first house?”  I’m glad you asked, and the answer is SIMPLE: the younger you start, the more likely you’ll have a home in your golden years that will have a boatload of equity that will enhance your retirement and investment strategies.  Let me show you.

Making only $25K/year, a young person could qualify for a duplex that costs $200K by renting out the one side for just $650/month and living in the other half (for at least a year).  This could be done through an FHA loan, so the down payment would only need to be $7K (3.5% of the purchase price), and that $7K could be a gift.  A person working an hourly job at $12.50/hour, 40 hours/week (with two weeks off for vacation – if their employer didn’t give them paid vacation) earns $25K/yr.  The average starting salary for a college graduate is about double that at $50K.  My point: starting now IS POSSIBLE (and HIGHLY recommended), and the sooner you start, the faster you can “trade up” to your dream house and eventually that last house that’s going to take care of you. 

Let me close this with a set of lyrics that make a little more sense – they’re from Billy Joel: “Hot funk, cool punk, even if it’s old junk / It’s still rock and roll to me.”  Translation: age and style don’t matter – it’s all about the equity!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...
Post a Comment
Read more