Skip to main content

Avoiding the "B" Word in Lending

Let’s open this week’s column with a quote from Dr. Ben Carson, head of the United States Department of Urban Development also known by it’s much cooler street nickname of HUD (which is not to be confused with the Paul Newman movie of the same name):

“Bureaucrats are people who think their rules are more important than the goals.” 

This column isn’t going to be about breaking the rules or anything like that quite the opposite, actually.  Here in our culture, we often talk about and revere the mavericks, the rule breakers.  They make for a good movie or book, for sure.  However, when people excel and achieve while KEEPING the rules no matter how restrictive they may seem THAT is when you have a very cool and intriguing story. 

Anyone who’s been forced to read some of Shakespeare’s sonnets can attest to the fact he seems to use A LOT of words to convey a simple thought.  One might argue that Old Will was getting paid by the word, so he was fluffing it up at every turn.  However, when you learn a little more about Shakespeare you’ll find that he was a very skillful writer who used every word concisely.  Let me explain. 

When writing many of his sonnets, he employed something called iambic pentameter (which sounds like a disease you get from not taking your vitamins) it’s a sort of rhythm he used when writing these sonnets that forced him to find the perfect word with the proper number of syllables or one that could be “chopped up” to fit that rhythm.  In other words, by using this cadence and living by its “rules”, he demonstrated that he had a much better command of the language and ability to express his thoughts than many of his contemporaries he stood out, and he was highly sought after by patrons (customers) because of this. 

As I said before, this column’s purpose this week is not to advocate rule breaking but to praise and laud those people who play by the rules AND WIN.  I’m not going to get all controversial on you, but that’s the reason so many people refuse to recognize Barry Bonds as the reigning home run champion of all time they think he found a way AROUND the rules, and they don’t wish to honor him.  (If you want to argue amongst yourselves about the validity of Bonds’ title, I’ll wait.) 

Sure, there are illegal and unethical means that less-than-stellar agents and loan officers can (and sometimes do) employ to “get ahead” of the competition these folks should be avoided like the plague (and iambic pentameter I prefer poetry that rhymes).  But when you’re a self-employed stamp collector whose sole source of income is bartered beaver pelts and we get you a loan when no one else can, it’ll be because we played by the rules and kept looking until we found something that fit for you we’ll stand out, and we’ll be highly sought after by your friends and family because of this. 


For those other lenders who insist that their rules won’t allow them to give you a loan, I can think of another “B” word to describe them: BUMMER!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.   She said they were behind the couch.   She was right.”   Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.   The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right?   They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).   Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.   There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a