Skip to main content

Avoiding the "B" Word in Lending

Let’s open this week’s column with a quote from Dr. Ben Carson, head of the United States Department of Urban Development also known by it’s much cooler street nickname of HUD (which is not to be confused with the Paul Newman movie of the same name):

“Bureaucrats are people who think their rules are more important than the goals.” 

This column isn’t going to be about breaking the rules or anything like that quite the opposite, actually.  Here in our culture, we often talk about and revere the mavericks, the rule breakers.  They make for a good movie or book, for sure.  However, when people excel and achieve while KEEPING the rules no matter how restrictive they may seem THAT is when you have a very cool and intriguing story. 

Anyone who’s been forced to read some of Shakespeare’s sonnets can attest to the fact he seems to use A LOT of words to convey a simple thought.  One might argue that Old Will was getting paid by the word, so he was fluffing it up at every turn.  However, when you learn a little more about Shakespeare you’ll find that he was a very skillful writer who used every word concisely.  Let me explain. 

When writing many of his sonnets, he employed something called iambic pentameter (which sounds like a disease you get from not taking your vitamins) it’s a sort of rhythm he used when writing these sonnets that forced him to find the perfect word with the proper number of syllables or one that could be “chopped up” to fit that rhythm.  In other words, by using this cadence and living by its “rules”, he demonstrated that he had a much better command of the language and ability to express his thoughts than many of his contemporaries he stood out, and he was highly sought after by patrons (customers) because of this. 

As I said before, this column’s purpose this week is not to advocate rule breaking but to praise and laud those people who play by the rules AND WIN.  I’m not going to get all controversial on you, but that’s the reason so many people refuse to recognize Barry Bonds as the reigning home run champion of all time they think he found a way AROUND the rules, and they don’t wish to honor him.  (If you want to argue amongst yourselves about the validity of Bonds’ title, I’ll wait.) 

Sure, there are illegal and unethical means that less-than-stellar agents and loan officers can (and sometimes do) employ to “get ahead” of the competition these folks should be avoided like the plague (and iambic pentameter I prefer poetry that rhymes).  But when you’re a self-employed stamp collector whose sole source of income is bartered beaver pelts and we get you a loan when no one else can, it’ll be because we played by the rules and kept looking until we found something that fit for you we’ll stand out, and we’ll be highly sought after by your friends and family because of this. 


For those other lenders who insist that their rules won’t allow them to give you a loan, I can think of another “B” word to describe them: BUMMER!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...