Skip to main content

When It's Good to be Wrong

We don’t like to do pre-quals.  There, I said it – but now I better explain it.  A very large number of potential homebuyers think a pre-qual is a short two-minute phone call where a loan originator asks them a handful of questions about their income and other sundry financial details, punches some numbers into a calculator, and says, “You’re golden!  Go out and put an offer in on that house and have fun riding your pet unicorn.” Obviously, there’s a bit more to a pre-qual than that, but when loan originators simply ask a couple of questions, they’re setting themselves (along with the buyer and the agent) up for failure – a failure that usually manifests itself AFTER a home has gone under contract – and the last I checked, that’s not good. 

For the most part, when a potential homebuyer comes to us for a “pre-qual”, we ask a lot more questions and, quite often, go so far as to ask for certain documents before we issue anything that says the person is qualified for any amount of a loan.  By doing it this way, we assure that when buyers go through the formal loan application process, they get approved.  Research has shown that people are much happier when they get their loan applications approved as opposed to getting a big, fat denial – you can’t argue with science. 

There’s an old saying that applies to a lot of instances: “The customer is always right.”  In the real estate/mortgage world, however, not so much.  Hear me out.  There are a lot of misconceptions that many, if not most, homebuyers have when they start the process of looking for and purchasing a home.  Down payments – needing to be at least 20% - is one of the biggest, of course, and I’ve written about that a lot in the past (so I’m not going to beat that dead horse – not today).  There are others surrounding eligibility as related to bankruptcy, foreclosure, etc. – there are a lot more options and shorter waiting periods than what most people think exist.  While those are major misconceptions that agents and loan officers alike are constantly trying to remove from the collective mindset, the biggest misconception keeping people from buying a home is – are you ready for this – IGNORANCE.  Okay, that’s a little harsh, but I got your attention, right?  Forgive me, please. 

The #1 thing that keeps people from buying a house is they have no idea what they’re qualified to buy.  People can rattle off their credit score (whether it’s correct or not) faster than their social security number, but if you were to ask them how much of a 30-year mortgage (and its accompanying monthly payment) they would qualify for based on their income and financial standing, they would look at you like you just asked them to perform a lewd act in public.  Usually, when you hear someone say, “You know, I’m not sure where I want to end up, so I’m going to keep renting for now,” what they’re actually saying is, “I have no idea how much of a mortgage I would qualify for.”

Let’s start something and get it to go viral: on your social media – personal AND business – post the question “Do you know how much of a mortgage you qualify for?”  And then follow that question with this statement: “I’ll bet you don’t.  Call ANY mortgage company TODAY and find out – it’s FREE!”  For those who follow this advice, they’ll most likely find that the only person who doesn’t qualify for SOMETHING is about as rare as a unicorn.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...
Post a Comment
Read more