Skip to main content

Real Estate's Healthy Engine

A friend of mine works for a major car manufacturer in his capacity as a mechanic and technician he’s been with the same company for over 20 years, so it’s safe to say he knows a thing or two about how engines work, right?  Whenever I have a problem with my car that extends beyond needing new tires or an oil change, I always reach out to him to see if he can give me an idea of what’s going on and how much it’s going to cost to fix it. 

In the times he’s kindly come over to look at one of my ailing vehicles, I’ve learned a couple of things.  One is you don’t need nearly as many “things” to change your spark plugs as the folks at the auto parts store try to sell you.  The other little morsel of wisdom is in order for a car to start and run, it needs three things: air, spark, and fuel.  For an internal combustion engine, if you take one of these three things away, you don’t get the controlled explosion that makes the heart of your engine pump.  (Side note: this is not to be confused with Earth, Wind, and Fire the band whose music you need as a vital part of a play list to make the heart of your party pump.)

As if you didn’t see this coming from a mile away, I’m now going to equate this to a successful real estate transaction one that lives and breathes.  The air, spark, and fuel in a successful real estate transaction is, respectively, an agent, a buyer, and a mortgage person if you take one of these three things away, you just have a couple of people trying to make pleasant but possibly awkward conversation. 

The agent supplies the oxygen the vitality, if you will with her/his knowledge, expertise, attention to detail, and zealous representation of the buyer’s best interests.  The buyer provides the spark the excitement and drive to acquire that first investment, a home in which to start a family, a vacation property or second home, or a home after relocation.  And the lender, of course, provides the right type of fuel and the correct amount to get everyone to that final destination.

There are specific things that each party MUST do that the other two parties can’t, of course.  In most instances, this is understood and doesn’t need to be discussed.  However, would it be a bad idea to get all three parties in one room before a property is previewed or a prequalification occurs to discuss the expectations everyone has of one another and have all three agree to live up to their parts?  If this were to occur (assuming everyone did, in fact, live up to what they promised to do), we would have smoother, shorter, and more seamless closings.  Why?  One word: accountability.  When someone is accountable (buyer included), they pay better attention.

Let’s return to our car analogy:  whether it’s a Mercedes-Benz S 560 (a luxury home) or a Fiat 500c (a one-bedroom condo), you still need air, spark, and fuel you can’t substitute even one of those things, and each one has to do its part equally well, or all you have is a hunk of materials that no one wants to buy or own.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Definition of Insanity (in Real Estate)

More than a couple of years ago, I witnessed something that makes me laugh and cringe at the same time.  Having lunch at a local restaurant, I spied a real estate agent and a loan originator having what I would characterize as a “first date”. I couldn’t help but overhear little snippets of their conversation, and as far as I could tell, things were going relatively well . . . at least until the agent asked the LO this question: “So, do you like to sit at open houses with agents?”  I immediately looked to the LO’s face awaiting the response.  I didn’t need to hear another single word coming out of the LO’s mouth because his face said everything:  you would have thought the agent had asked him if he enjoyed bobbing for apples in a pool of acid judging by the look on his face.  While his face was communicating complete revulsion, his lips said, “Yes, of course.”  And that’s when I looked over at the agent’s face to see, ...

Time for a New York-Style Housing Fix

Previously, I’ve written about a man who works in our office who lived in New York City back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s – let me assure you that while that does seem like a very long time ago, it’s not nearly as far bac k as when the wheel was invented and humankind learned to harness the power of fire. If you’ve been to New York City recently and blissfully walked around Harlem to get chicken and waffles at Sylvia’s on Malcolm X Boulevard between 126 th and 127 th Streets or stopped in at Keybar on 13 th Street between First Avenue and Avenue A to wedge yourself into a cozy corner next to their notable fireplace, you wouldn’t get a sense that these areas were once . . . not as welcoming and glitzy as you now see them. Our office mate has told some fairly interesting stories of living in those and other areas of New York City that give a much different sense.   In the late ‘80s/early ‘90s, no matter how many great things you heard about Sylvia’s food, 127 th Str...

Change: the Only Sure Thing

Which headline is better for grabbing your attention and prompting you to read the article to which it’s attached: “Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, But Read on to See if This Even Applies to You” or “ Credit Reports to Exclude Certain Negative Information, Boosting FICO Scores”?   Obviously, the former is less than tantalizing while the latter makes you say, “Tell me more!”   I was in the “tell me more” camp, and the folks at The Wall Street Journal sucked me into their vortex. The development, set to go into practice on July 1 st , is certainly a departure from how the Big Three (Experian, TransUnion , and Equifax) have done things in the past, but it’s not going to wave a magic wand and make bankruptcies, foreclosures, short sales, etc., go away.   It’s sort of a bittersweet development.   Let me explain: Many tax liens and civil judgments will be removed from people’s credit reports if they don’t include a complete list of a...