Skip to main content

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters


“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information.  She said they were behind the couch.  She was right.”  Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny.  The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right? 

They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep).
 
Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market.  There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can afford at 4.5% and 5.5%.  For example, with a monthly P&I payment of $1,600, a buyer could afford a home just under $400,000 at 4.5%, while that same payment with a 5.5% interest rate could only buy them a $350,000 home – those are vastly different neighborhoods, and that could also spell the difference between staying in that home for 7+ years or having to move in 3-4 years to accommodate a larger family, not to mention what home prices may be in 3-4 years when that move is necessary.

This next graph shows interest rates going back to when they peaked in July, 2008 at 6.63%.  I don’t have a crystal ball, and I have absolutely no insider information about what will happen to interest rates in the next ten years or even ten months, but using historical data has always been a fairly good way to predict what’s coming.  Clearly, interest rates aren’t going to shoot up into the stratosphere tomorrow, but they look like they’re certainly on the climb.  The takeaway from this is very simple: if you or anyone you know is on the fence about buying, these two graphs make a very good case for getting off that fence and start looking now – you’ll get a better night’s sleep in a home than on a fence, right?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer.  In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender.  To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available.  Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing  –  and they’re right (sort of).  The purpose of today’s article is si
Post a Comment
Read more

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend  –  because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous.  Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well.   An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn.     In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world.     We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)?     Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500.     His shares would now be worth over $50 billion.     WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million.  Blockbuster turned Hastings down.  Netflix is now wor
Post a Comment
Read more