A Richer Path to Your Dream Home

With low inventory of good homes to purchase, what's a first-time homebuyer to do? Sure, buying a fixer upper is a possibility, but there's another (more financially rewarding) option to consider.

With only a 3.5% down payment, a first-time homebuyer could purchase a duplex, triplex, or fourplex! Awesome!!!!!

Wait, did I lose you there? Hear me out, and you'll be glad you did.

You could purchase a multi-unit property (up to four units), live in one of the units, and rent out the remaining units. The rents for the remaining units can pay the entirety of your mortgage (or a major portion of it). Do I have your attention now?

"My income's not high enough to purchase a property that big," you might be saying right now. Au contraire. (I've never used that phrase before in any of my writings.) The rents of the other units you're not occupying can be counted IMMEDIATELY as income based on the appraised value of rents in the surrounding area. And you're only required to live in that multi-unit property for a year.

For many first-time homebuyers, this is the ideal way for them to get into a home AND have an investment property. Because you have other parties paying rent for the remaining units in your property, more often than not, those rents are paying the entire monthly mortgage payment (or a ginormous chunk of it). When you've lived in your property for a year, you can move out, slide in an additional renter, keep the property, and go purchase a single-family residence (white picket fence included) possibly with a bigger yard and a little more room to grow.

Let's recap: only 3.5% down, the possibility/probability that someone else will pay all (or a large portion) of your monthly mortgage, AND an investment property that produces passive income as you move out and buy your dream home. Is there anyone out there who thinks that's bad? I didn't think so.

Comments

Financial Nearsightedness

Years ago when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created, we had some wacko thought that part of the job of the folks filling its ranks would be to . . . protect the consumer. In some people’s view, this would mean that builders of new homes would no longer be able to dangle the carrot of “free” incentives if the buyer would finance the purchase through the builder’s in-house or preferred lender. To those same people, it just made sense that the CFPB was created to even the playing field and make it so that the consumer got the very best deal available. Well, we were wrong. Builders ARE allowed to offer incentives for using their in-house and preferred lenders despite the fact that sort of goes against the idea that the consumer is getting the very best deal available. And for most consumers, all they see is the incentive, and this computes to less money coming out of their pocket at closing – and they’re right (sort of). The purpose of today’s article is si

Topless Professionals - Nope

Fads come and go, certainly, but you can’t always tell the difference in the moment between a fad and a trend – because refusing to adapt to the trends can be limiting . . . if not disastrous. Let me share a couple of examples where failing to see where things were headed didn’t turn out well. An engineer presented the idea of a “filmless camera” to the executives at Kodak back in 1975, but they laughed him to scorn. In 2012, Kodak was forced to file for bankruptcy because they failed to adapt to the digital world. We all know Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, but how many of us recognize the name of Ron Wayne (and, no, that’s not Batman’s brother)? Ronny was the third founding member of Apple, and he sold his 10% stake in the company in 1976 for $1500. His shares would now be worth over $50 billion. WAY BACK in 2000, Reed Hastings approached Blockbuster and offered to sell Netflix for $50 million. Blockbuster turned Hastings down. Netflix is now wor

Sitting on the Fence Only Gives You Splinters

“I woke up this morning and couldn't find my socks, so I called information. She said they were behind the couch. She was right.” Reading the words of comedian Stephen Wright isn’t quite the same as actually hearing them with his deadpan delivery, but they’re still funny. The same can be said for timeless wisdom: whether you hear it coming directly from the lips of a wizened old sage or you read it in a little missive such as this, it’s still wisdom, right? They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so you’re about to get 2,000 words’ worth right here: I’m going to show you two graphs that are going to speak volumes about buying power and interest rates – far more than I could convey if I tried to write over 2,000 words (and probably put you to sleep). Obviously, this first graph shows how even a slight change in interest rates can affect someone’s buying power in the real estate market. There’s a fairly big swing between what someone can a

Search This Blog